VS

Ford Puma vs VW ID.Polo comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 226 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW ID.Polo?

Ford Puma vs VW ID.Polo: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more efficient
  • a bit lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

VW ID.Polo

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW ID.Polo is slightly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,490 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is marginally more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 13.3 kWh/100km for the VW ID.Polo. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the VW ID.Polo offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 454 km, about 37 km more than the Ford Puma.

ID.Polo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.Polo offers markedly more power – delivering 226 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.Polo is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 290 Nm.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is a bit lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,568 kg. The difference is around 252 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more boot space – 523 L compared to 441 L. That’s a difference of about 82 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW ID.Polo is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ID.Polo

VW ID.Polo

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 226 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 424 - 454 km
Ford Puma
VW ID.Polo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

VW ID.Polo

The VW ID.Polo brings classic Polo sensibility to the EV age with a calm, refined ride, an unusually large boot, and refreshingly simple controls with real buttons. It favors easygoing efficiency and family-friendly practicality over playful handling or high-speed autobahn pace, and the smaller-battery versions ask for a bit more planning on long trips.

details
Ford Puma
VW ID.Polo

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
21,400 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.3 - 14.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
424 - 454 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,568 - 1,635 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
441 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,816 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
444 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 226 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 166 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.