VS

Ford Ranger vs Mazda 3 Hatchback comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Ford Ranger vs Mazda 3 Hatchback: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • visibly more power
  • significantly more efficient
details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Hatchback is significantly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,419 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

3 Hatchback

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers visibly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers considerably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 457 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is significantly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 988 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries considerably more – 989 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 487 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Ranger
Maxus T90 EV
VS
Ford Ranger and Maxus T90 EV go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus …
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
Ford Puma and Mazda 3 Hatchback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Puma or the Mazda …
Ford Ranger
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres

Reviews Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
j m
29 Jun 2026, 22:06:55

power
efficiency and low consumption
driving pleasure
wonderful e-drive and head-up projection display on the windshield

Frequently compared as well

Ford Ranger
Isuzu D-Max
VS
In the competitive midsize pickup segment, the Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max offer robust performance and versatility for both work and recreation. The Ranger impresses with its powerful engine options and advanced technology features, while the D-Max is renowned for its durability and off-road …
Kia Ceed
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
In the dynamic world of hatchbacks, the Kia Ceed and Mazda 3 Hatchback go head-to-head, each offering distinct advantages. The Kia Ceed impresses with its efficient engine options and practical, spacious interior, making it a top contender for family drivers seeking reliability. On the other hand, …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Hilux
VS
In the ongoing battle of the midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and Toyota Hilux both deliver rugged performance and reliability, making them favorites among adventure enthusiasts. The Ranger stands out with its dynamic driving experience and modern technology, while the Hilux is renowned for its …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Opel Corsa
VS
Mazda 3 Hatchback and Opel Corsa go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda 3 Hatchback or …
Ford Ranger
Jeep Wrangler
VS
In the rugged realm of off-road legends, the Ford Ranger and the Jeep Wrangler stand as formidable contenders, each boasting unique strengths. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its remarkable towing capacity and efficient powertrain, making it a practical choice for those who need versatility both …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Mazda CX-5
VS
Mazda 3 Hatchback and Mazda CX-5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda 3 Hatchback or …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Ranger
VS
Ford Explorer EV and Ford Ranger go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Explorer EV or …
Ford Ranger
Mazda 3 Hatchback

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
126 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
351 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
487 - 502 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.