VS

Ford Ranger vs Mazda 3 Sedan comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mazda 3 Sedan?

Ford Ranger vs Mazda 3 Sedan: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
details

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,462 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

3 Sedan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers clearly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers significantly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 457 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is considerably lighter – 1,420 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 985 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 508 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 42 km
Ford Ranger
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
Ford Ranger
Mazda 3 Sedan

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
123 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
450 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
467 - 481 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.