Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Renault Kangoo Compact Van – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Two cars, one duel: Ford Ranger meets Renault Kangoo Compact Van.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo Compact Van has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22400 £, while the Ford Ranger costs 37500 £. That’s a price difference of around 15085 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Renault Kangoo Compact Van with 5.10 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Renault Kangoo Compact Van performs significantly better – achieving up to 290 km, about 248 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger has a decisively edge – offering 292 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van takes 11.60 s. That’s about 3.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Ranger performs barely noticeable better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo Compact Van tops out at 176 km/h. The difference is around 14 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Ranger pulls decisively stronger with 697 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 427 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo Compact Van is evident lighter – 1493 kg compared to 2082 kg. The difference is around 589 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger to a small extent takes the win – 1108 kg compared to 901 kg. That’s a difference of about 207 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Ranger shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £37,500
Ford Ranger
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger stands out in the pickup market with its robust build and versatile capabilities, making it a popular choice for both work and leisure. Its modern design is complemented by a well-equipped interior, providing comfort and advanced technology. Whether tackling challenging terrains or cruising through the city, the Ranger delivers a reliable and dynamic driving experience.
details
@ media.ford.com
@ media.ford.com
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
The Renault Kangoo is a versatile small van that seamlessly blends practicality with modern design. It offers a spacious interior, making it ideal for transporting goods or passengers while maintaining a compact exterior for easy manoeuvrability in urban settings. Equipped with efficient engines, the Kangoo balances performance with economy, catering to the diverse needs of businesses and individual users alike.
details
@ Renault
@ Renault
@ Renault
@ Renault
@ Renault
@ Renault
Ford Ranger
Renault Kangoo Compact Van
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37500 - 71900 £
|
Price
22400 - 37000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 5.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
261 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
0 - 151 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
2 - 4
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2082 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
1493 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5370 - 5420 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4910 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1868 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1854 - 1864 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3000 - 4900 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 1108 kg
|
Payload
498 - 901 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
75 - 122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 12.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 18.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 176 km/h
|
|
Torque
405 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
125 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
55 - 90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.