VS

Ford Ranger vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Suzuki Swace?

Ford Ranger vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki Swace is significantly cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,562 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki Swace with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 141 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is clearly lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 930 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries significantly more – 989 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 629 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 42 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Ford Ranger
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Ranger
Maxus T90 EV
VS
Ford Ranger and Maxus T90 EV go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus …
Ford Ranger
Isuzu D-Max
VS
In the competitive midsize pickup segment, the Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max offer robust performance and versatility for both work and recreation. The Ranger impresses with its powerful engine options and advanced technology features, while the D-Max is renowned for its durability and off-road …
Ford Ranger
VW Amarok
VS
In the competitive realm of midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and VW Amarok showcase distinctive strengths that cater to varied preferences. The Ford Ranger is celebrated for its robust towing capacity and advanced tech features, making it a favorite for both rugged adventures and urban commuting. …
Ford Focus
Suzuki Swace
VS
In a showdown between the Ford Focus and the Suzuki Swace, the Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and robust engine options that cater to driving enthusiasts seeking a spirited ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace offers a practical hybrid drivetrain with outstanding fuel efficiency, making it …
Ford Ranger
Toyota Hilux
VS
In the ongoing battle of the midsize pickups, the Ford Ranger and Toyota Hilux both deliver rugged performance and reliability, making them favorites among adventure enthusiasts. The Ranger stands out with its dynamic driving experience and modern technology, while the Hilux is renowned for its …
Ford Ranger
VW Touareg
VS
In the realm of versatile vehicles, the Ford Ranger and the VW Touareg appeal to distinct audiences yet both deliver exceptional capabilities. The Ford Ranger, known for its ruggedness and affordability, shines in off-road adventures and everyday utility. Meanwhile, the VW Touareg offers a …
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Discovery
VS
Ford Ranger and Land Rover Discovery go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or …
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Ranger
VS
Ford Explorer EV and Ford Ranger go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Ford Explorer EV or …
Ford Ranger
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Estate
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.