Compare performance (281 HP vs 460 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 31,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Tesla Model 3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive realm witnesses an unfathomable comparison: the rugged Ford Ranger goes head-to-head against the innovative Tesla Model 3. In this showdown between diesel-driven power and electric efficiency, the choice hinges on what matters most to you - raw durability or cutting-edge innovation.
The Ford Ranger embodies the essence of a traditional pickup, showcasing a robust design catered for off-road adventures and utility. With seating options for up to five passengers, it promises versatility, offering various configurations in body structure with two or four doors.
Conversely, the Tesla Model 3 breaks conventional molds with its sleek hatchback design, eyeing futuristic aesthetics. With a steadfast dedication to electric efficiency, the Model 3’s five-door layout caters to modern drivers seeking style and substance.
Empowered by both diesel and petrol options, the Ford Ranger packs a punch with engine capacities ranging from 2000 to 3000 cm³ and power from 170 to 292 HP. The robust manual and automatic gearboxes complement its all-wheel-drive system, delivering power precisely when needed.
Tesla’s electric prowess is evident in the Model 3. All-electric with rear and all-wheel drive options, the Model 3 commands the highway with up to 460 HP from a reduction gearbox. Efficiency remains a cornerstone, with consumption as low as 12.5 kWh/100km.
The Ford Ranger thrives off-road with a maximum speed of 190 km/h and acceleration from 0-100 km/h between 7.9 to 12.1 seconds, depending on the variant. Its payload capacity nears 1108 kg, showcasing strength suited for any terrain. However, with a CO2 efficiency class of G, it remains environmentally unyielding.
In stark contrast, the Model 3 reaches a top speed of 262 km/h, and its thrilling acceleration, going from 0-100 km/h between 3.1 to 6.1 seconds, showcases electric agility. With an innovative range between 513 to 702 km, the Model 3 flaunts unparalleled energy efficiency promising zero emissions.
The Ranger’s impressive build ranges in length from 5370mm to 5420mm, with heights peaking at 1922mm, boasting a substantial curb weight up to 2486 kg. It straddles utility and boldness, ready for the rough roads ahead.
The Model 3’s aerodynamic dimensions stand at 4720mm in length and a slender 1440 to 1441mm in height. Despite its smaller stature, the Model 3 maximizes its interior space with a 594 L trunk capacity while keeping the curb weight under 1919 kg.
The Ford Ranger and Tesla Model 3 offer starkly different realms of automotive innovation. The Ranger’s diesel grit embodies raw strength, ready for traditional adventure seekers. In contrast, the Model 3 heralds the electric future, alluring with its technology-driven efficiency aimed at the eco-conscious.
Your choice hinges on preference: trailblazing electric innovation or steadfast diesel reliability? The path you tread defines the destination you cherish. Embark on your journey accordingly.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Tesla Model 3 is substantially cheaper – starting at 31,700 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,734 £.
As for electric range, the Tesla Model 3 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 750 km, about 708 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 offers markedly more power – delivering 460 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 179 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.1 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 5.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers marginally more torque with 697 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 37 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Tesla Model 3 is visibly lighter – 1,772 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 633 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries clearly more – 989 kg compared to 377 kg. That’s a difference of about 612 kg.
The Tesla Model 3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
|
Price
31,700 - 50,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
534 - 750 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
70 - 265 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,772 - 1,929 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
594 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,918 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
845 - 989 kg
|
Payload
303 - 377 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
|
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
|
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Tesla
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España