Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs Volvo XC90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (292 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (45600 £ vs 69800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Volvo XC90?
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Ranger has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 45600 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 69800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 24179 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Ranger manages with 3.10 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Volvo XC90 with 3.50 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Volvo XC90 performs significantly better – achieving up to 71 km, about 29 km more than the Ford Ranger.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 292 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 7.90 s. That’s about 2.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Ranger performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Volvo XC90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC90 pulls barely noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 697 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm difference.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Volvo XC90 is slightly lighter – 2080 kg compared to 2405 kg. The difference is around 325 kg.
When it comes to payload, Ford Ranger noticeable takes the win – 989 kg compared to 710 kg. That’s a difference of about 279 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC90 has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Ranger
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £69,800
Volvo XC90
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
Volvo XC90
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Ford Ranger
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45600 - 71900 £
|
Price
69800 - 84600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.5 - 8.5 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
71 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.80 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
79 - 191 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2405 - 2511 kg
|
Curb weight
2080 - 2297 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
262 - 302 L
|
|
Length
5370 - 5381 mm
|
Length
4953 mm
|
|
Width
1918 - 1968 mm
|
Width
1923 mm
|
|
Height
1884 - 1922 mm
|
Height
1771 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1816 - 1856 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 989 kg
|
Payload
653 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1996 - 2993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Ford Ranger?
The Ford Ranger is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.