Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Ranger vs VW Caddy Compact Van comparison
Compare performance (292 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (45,600 £ vs 25,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or VW Caddy Compact Van?
Ranger
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW Caddy Compact Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,800 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 45,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,762 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Ranger with 3.1 L/100km. The difference is about 2.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the VW Caddy Compact Van offers substantially more range – reaching up to 120 km, about 78 km more than the Ford Ranger.
Caddy Compact Van
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers significantly more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 142 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Ford Ranger is marginally faster – reaching 190 km/h, while the VW Caddy Compact Van tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 4 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers considerably more torque with 697 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 377 Nm more.
Ranger
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy Compact Van is significantly lighter – 1,442 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 963 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries visibly more – 989 kg compared to 759 kg. That’s a difference of about 230 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The VW Caddy Compact Van is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £25,800
VW Caddy Compact Van
Ford Ranger
VW Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Ranger
The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.
details
VW Caddy Compact Van
The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.
details
Ford Ranger
VW Caddy Compact Van
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,600 - 71,900 £
|
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 13.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
42 km
|
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
|
co2
70 - 315 g/km
|
co2
11 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
|
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
5,370 - 5,381 mm
|
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
|
|
Width
1,918 - 1,968 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
1,884 - 1,922 mm
|
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
|
|
Payload
676 - 989 kg
|
Payload
628 - 759 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
210 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
491 - 697 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
154 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,993 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
VW
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.