Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Peugeot 3008 comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Peugeot 3008?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Peugeot 3008: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Tourneo Connect is noticeably cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Peugeot 3008 costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,472 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Peugeot 3008 with 2.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Peugeot 3008 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 698 km, about 579 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
3008
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 3008 offers significantly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 175 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 3008 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 4.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot 3008 delivers markedly more torque with 511 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 161 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is barely lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 1,648 kg. The difference is around 106 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers clearly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 1,200 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries substantially more – 818 kg compared to 467 kg. That’s a difference of about 351 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot 3008
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Peugeot 3008
The Peugeot 3008 blends striking, modern styling with a comfortable, well-appointed interior that feels more premium than its class. It's practical and composed on the road, with clever storage and driver-focused tech that make it an easy choice for everyday family life or longer, relaxed drives.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot 3008
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 5.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 - 17.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
81 - 698 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
0 - 121 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
1,648 - 2,266 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 520 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,895 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
432 - 467 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 325 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 511 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 239 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.