VS

Ford Tourneo Connect vs Skoda Kodiaq – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Tourneo Connect or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Tourneo Connect @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Tourneo Connect has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27300 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9506 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore evident more efficient than the Ford Tourneo Connect with 0.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – achieving up to 123 km, about 4 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.

Kodiaq @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.10 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs to a small extent better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Ford Tourneo Connect tops out at 186 km/h. The difference is around 45 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls to a small extent stronger with 400 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

Tourneo Connect @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is slight lighter – 1542 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers convincingly more room – 1720 L compared to 910 L. That’s a difference of about 810 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Tourneo Connect performs evident better – up to 3105 L, which is about 1000 L more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

When it comes to payload, Ford Tourneo Connect clearly perceptible takes the win – 818 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 273 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Ford Tourneo Connect

The Ford Tourneo Connect represents a versatile option in the people carrier segment, offering a blend of functionality and comfort for family or business use. Its design combines modern aesthetics with the practicality needed for daily operations, making it an appealing choice for those seeking a reliable and adaptable vehicle. Inside, the Tourneo Connect provides a spacious and well-thought-out interior, ensuring a comfortable driving experience for both driver and passengers.

details
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_07 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_08 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_13 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__INT_22 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__INT_31 @ tourneoconnect.fordpresskits.com

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you want maximum space and minimum spend — just don’t expect leather and laser-cut precision.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and driving pep, but the Kodiaq will still win the school run.
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Kodiaq
Tourneo Connect
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
27300 - 41900 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
11 - 164 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1542 - 1781 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
1213 - 1720 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4500 - 4868 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1855 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1833 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
2556 - 3105 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
563 - 818 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a boot that could double as a small country.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Courier
VS
In the competitive world of versatile family vehicles, the Ford Tourneo Connect and Ford Tourneo Courier stand out for their practicality and comfort. While the Tourneo Connect offers a more spacious interior ideal for larger families or those needing additional cargo space, the Tourneo Courier impresses with its compact size and agility, making it perfect for urban environments. Both models feature Ford's latest technology and safety features, ensuring a smooth drive regardless of your choice.
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Partner
VS
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing to families who prioritize comfort and adaptability. Both models offer distinct strengths, making the choice between them a matter of individual lifestyle needs and preferences.
Ford Tourneo Connect
VW Caddy
VS
In the competitive segment of compact vans, the Ford Tourneo Connect stands out for its impressive versatility and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for families and businesses alike. Meanwhile, the VW Caddy impresses with its robust build quality and refined interior, which prioritize comfort and practicality. Both models offer unique strengths, but the right choice ultimately depends on personal preferences and specific needs.
Is the Ford Tourneo Connect offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.