Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison
Compare performance (150 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (27,300 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Skoda Kodiaq?
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Tourneo Connect is markedly cheaper – starting at 27,300 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,535 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 3 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.1 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers somewhat more torque with 400 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is very slightly lighter – 1,542 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers significantly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 910 L. That’s a difference of about 810 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries visibly more – 818 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 255 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Tourneo Connect is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.