Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Tourneo Connect vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (150 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (27300 £ vs 36800 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Tourneo Connect or Skoda Kodiaq?
Tourneo Connect
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Tourneo Connect has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 27300 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9506 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Tourneo Connect manages with 0.50 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.50 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs slight better – achieving up to 122 km, about 3 km more than the Ford Tourneo Connect.
Kodiaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly edge – offering 265 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Ford Tourneo Connect takes 10.10 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls to a small extent stronger with 400 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Tourneo Connect
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Tourneo Connect is slight lighter – 1542 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers convincingly more room – 1720 L compared to 910 L. That’s a difference of about 810 L.
When it comes to payload, Ford Tourneo Connect clearly perceptible takes the win – 818 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 255 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Tourneo Connect shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £27,300
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Kodiaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Tourneo Connect
The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Ford Tourneo Connect
Skoda Kodiaq
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27300 - 41900 £
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
11 - 164 g/km
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1542 - 1781 kg
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
1213 - 1720 L
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
|
Width
1855 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
|
Payload
563 - 818 kg
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
|
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1968 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Ford Tourneo Connect offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.