VS

Ford Tourneo Custom vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which model is better for everyday use?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Tourneo Custom or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Kodiaq has a distinctly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Ford Tourneo Custom costs 45700 £. That’s a price difference of around 8899 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore strongly more efficient than the Ford Tourneo Custom with 4.10 L. The difference is about 3.70 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Tourneo Custom performs significantly better – achieving up to 307 km, about 184 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Custom has a barely noticeable edge – offering 286 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinctly better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Ford Tourneo Custom tops out at 150 km/h. The difference is around 81 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Custom pulls hardly any stronger with 415 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Tourneo Custom offers visibly more seating capacity – 8 vs 5.

In curb weight, the Skoda Kodiaq is significantly lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2453 kg. The difference is around 769 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers minimal more room – 910 L compared to 819 L. That’s a difference of about 91 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinctly better – up to 2105 L, which is about 751 L more than the Ford Tourneo Custom.

When it comes to payload, Ford Tourneo Custom visibly takes the win – 847 kg compared to 545 kg. That’s a difference of about 302 kg.

All in all, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is clearly superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It impresses with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile companion for everyday use.

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its spacious interior and family-friendly features, making it a top choice for those prioritizing comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the VW Tayron impresses with its stylish design and refined driving dynamics, appealing to those seeking a more premium experience. While both models share a common platform, their distinct personalities cater to different driver preferences, making this comparison essential for prospective buyers.
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV landscape, the Skoda Kodiaq and Dacia Bigster offer distinct advantages for buyers seeking practicality and value. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, making it a top choice for families. In contrast, the Bigster appeals to budget-conscious consumers with its robust design and functionality, proving that affordability doesn't have to compromise style or capability.

Ford Tourneo Custom

The Tourneo Custom stands out as an ideal choice for families and businesses alike, combining style and practicality in a spacious package. Its flexible seating configuration makes it perfect for both transporting passengers and cargo with ease. With a focus on comfort and connectivity, the Tourneo Custom creates a welcoming environment for all journeys, whether short trips around town or longer adventures on the road.

details
2022_FORD_TOURNEO_TITANIUM_01-LOW @ Ford
2022_FORD_TOURNEO_TITANIUM_02-LOW @ Ford
2022_FORD_TOURNEO_TITANIUM_03-LOW @ Ford
2022_FORD_TOURNEO_TITANIUM_04-LOW @ Ford
2022_FORD_TOURNEO_TITANIUM_INTERIOR_04-LOW @ Ford
2022_FORD_TOURNEO_TITANIUM_INTERIOR_05-LOW @ Ford

Skoda Kodiaq

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de
Ford Tourneo Custom
Skoda Kodiaq
Tourneo Custom
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
45700 - 67800 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 8.6 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
24.2 - 25.2 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
49 - 307 km
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
11.8 - 64 kWh
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
0 - 226 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 63 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
SUV
Seats
8
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2453 - 2707 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
672 - 819 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
5050 - 5450 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
2032 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1958 - 1959 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1045 - 1354 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
620 - 847 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
150 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
360 - 415 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1996 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2023 - 2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, A, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLB and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their unique blend of luxury and practicality. While the GLB boasts a premium interior and advanced technology features, the Kodiaq excels in space and functionality, making it a family-friendly choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preferences, whether it's the opulence of the GLB or the value and versatility of the Kodiaq.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium driving experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will hinge on whether buyers prioritize functionality or sophisticated comfort.
Renault Austral
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct advantages that cater to different driver needs. The Renault Austral stands out with its sleek design and cutting-edge technology, delivering an engaging drive with efficient hybrid options. Conversely, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and robust practicality, particularly appealing for families requiring ample cargo space and versatile seating.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
What drivetrain options does the Ford Tourneo Custom have?

The Ford Tourneo Custom is available as Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.