Compare performance (136 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (20,700 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Courier or Skoda Kamiq?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Courier is very slightly cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Skoda Kamiq costs 22,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,613 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.3 L/100km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kamiq offers only slightly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Courier delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is a bit lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,378 kg. The difference is around 147 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Courier carries noticeably more – 701 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 162 kg.
The Ford Transit Courier is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Courier is a compact, city-friendly van that hides surprising practicality behind a neat, no-nonsense exterior. Ideal for small businesses and urban runs, it pairs easy maneuverability and clever load solutions with a colleague-friendly driving position — proof that you don't need a giant van to get big jobs done.
detailsThe Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20,700 - 31,900 £
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 6.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
325 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 158 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,378 - 1,549 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
529 - 701 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 136 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 100 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,499 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|