Compare performance (286 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (49,700 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Transporter or Suzuki Vitara?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Vitara is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter costs 49,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,103 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers markedly more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 630 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 323 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsThe Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Suzuki
|