VS

GWM WEY 05 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (476 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (51,300 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM WEY 05 or Skoda Kodiaq?

GWM WEY 05 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

GWM WEY 05

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
  • substantially more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

WEY 05

Performance and Power: GWM WEY 05 vs. Skoda Kodiaq

In the ever-evolving SUV segment, both the GWM WEY 05 and Skoda Kodiaq carve their respective niches. The WEY 05, a plug-in hybrid, stands out with an astounding 476 HP and a massive torque of 847 Nm, propelling it from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5 seconds. In comparison, the top-performing Skoda Kodiaq variant offers 265 HP with 320 Nm torque, reaching 100 km/h in 6.3 seconds, providing a more conservative, yet sufficient performance.

Kodiaq

Efficiency and Consumption

Efficiency is a critical factor, and both vehicles present compelling arguments. The WEY 05 boasts an impressive fuel consumption of just 0.4 L/100km, with a remarkable electric range of 158 km, supported by a 33.7 kWh battery. Skoda Kodiaq's plug-in hybrid version matches the WEY 05 in consumption at 0.4 L/100km but offers a slightly shorter electric range of 123 km with a 19.7 kWh battery capacity.

Design Dimensions and Internal Space

Design and space utility are definitive aspects of an SUV. The WEY 05 measures in at 4870 mm in length, 1960 mm in width, and 1690 mm in height, with a trunk capacity of 500 liters. Conversely, the Kodiaq offers slightly more trunk space at up to 910 liters, with a more compact footprint of 4761 mm length, 1864 mm width, and varying heights around 1679 mm depending on the model.

Technical Innovations and Features

GWM has outfitted the WEY 05 with an advanced all-wheel drive system and dual-clutch automatic transmission, underscoring its sporty DNA. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq offers both front and all-wheel drive configurations and accompanies its various powertrains with a similar dual-clutch system, catering to different driving preferences.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Ideal SUV

Choosing between the GWM WEY 05 and Skoda Kodiaq is largely a matter of preference and need. The WEY 05 shines with its potent power, extensive electric range, and rapid acceleration, appealing to those prioritizing performance and eco-efficiency. In contrast, the Kodiaq provides a versatile range of options, with varying powertrain choices and more generous cargo space, making it a balanced choice for families and adventurers alike.

Ultimately, either vehicle promises a sophisticated and robust SUV experience, with unique strengths tailored to their intended audience.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

WEY 05

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq is markedly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the GWM WEY 05 costs 51,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,465 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the GWM WEY 05 uses 0.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the GWM WEY 05 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 158 km, about 36 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the GWM WEY 05 offers considerably more power – delivering 476 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 211 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM WEY 05 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM WEY 05 delivers significantly more torque with 847 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 447 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is substantially lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,410 kg. The difference is around 726 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 500 L. That’s a difference of about 410 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries visibly more – 563 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 178 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The GWM WEY 05 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,300
WEY 05

GWM WEY 05

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 476 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 158 km
details
GWM WEY 05
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

GWM WEY 05

The Wey 05 punches above its weight with striking coupe-SUV styling and an interior that feels far posher than its price tag suggests. For buyers who want cutting-edge tech and cabin comfort without the prestige tax, it’s a tempting proposition — just be ready for plenty of curious glances on the road.

details
serpimg_gPgpy4

Reviews GWM WEY 05

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC40
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40 both present compelling choices with their distinct offerings. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical features, making it an ideal choice for families who value comfort and utility. On the other hand, the XC40 …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
GWM WEY 05
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
51,300 - 54,800 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
158 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
12 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,410 - 2,440 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
500 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
4,758 mm
Width
1,960 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Payload
355 - 385 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
476 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Torque
847 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
350 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
GWM
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the GWM WEY 05?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.