VS

Honda CR-V vs Audi Q3 comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (42,800 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda CR-V or Audi Q3?

Honda CR-V vs Audi Q3: Key differences

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more trunk space

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CR-V

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q3 is slightly cheaper – starting at 38,200 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,543 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Honda CR-V with 2.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q3 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 119 km, about 41 km more than the Honda CR-V.

Q3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers markedly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers moderately more torque with 400 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.

CR-V

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is slightly lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 186 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers noticeably more boot space – 617 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 129 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries a bit more – 535 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Honda CR-V
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Honda CR-V
Lexus NX
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Lexus NX stand out for their unique strengths. While the CR-V impresses with its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, the Lexus NX offers a more luxurious feel and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these …
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Audi Q3
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq stand out with their distinct character and appeal. While the Q3 offers a luxurious interior and advanced tech features that cater to premium buyers, the Karoq impresses with its practicality and value for money, making it a …
Honda CR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
Honda CR-V and Honda ZR-V go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Audi Q3
BMW X3
VS
In the competitive segment of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and BMW X3 stand out for their distinct personalities and driving experiences. The Q3 offers a more compact design with a striking interior and advanced tech features, appealing to urban drivers seeking style and connectivity. In …
Honda CR-V
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
78 km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 - 152 g/km
co2
39 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,866 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
439 - 475 kg
Payload
505 - 535 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
335 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
Brand
Honda
Brand
Audi
Is the Honda CR-V offered with different drivetrains?

The Honda CR-V is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.