VS

Honda ZR-V vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda ZR-V or Skoda Kodiaq?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZR-V @ Honda

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Honda ZR-V has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 77 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Honda ZR-V with 5.70 L. The difference is about 5.30 L per 100 km.

Kodiaq @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable edge – offering 265 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 81 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Honda ZR-V takes 7.80 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Honda ZR-V tops out at 173 km/h. The difference is around 58 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls evident stronger with 400 Nm compared to 315 Nm. That’s about 85 Nm difference.

ZR-V @ Honda

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Honda ZR-V is hardly perceptible lighter – 1660 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 24 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 530 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2105 L, which is about 793 L more than the Honda ZR-V.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq somewhat takes the win – 545 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £36,800
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Honda ZR-V

5 (1)
rate

The Honda ZR-V is a standout in the compact SUV segment, offering a blend of sleek design and practical functionality. Its exterior is characterized by dynamic lines and a bold grille, capturing attention on the road. Inside, the ZR-V impresses with a comfortable and well-appointed cabin, providing drivers and passengers with a refined driving experience.

details
440009_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440010_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440007_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440004_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
440008_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439994_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439993_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439991_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439989_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439988_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439986_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439984_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439981_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439980_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439978_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439979_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda
439971_2023_Honda_ZR-V_e_HEV_Advance @ Honda

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Honda ZR-V
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Honda ZR‑V brings sharper handling and a more premium-feeling cabin, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a bit of sparkle for everyday practicality, fuel-sipping reliability and stronger resale prospects. If you want a compact SUV that’s slightly more fun to drive and feels a touch upmarket, take the ZR‑V; if you need a fuss-free, roomy runabout that’s kinder to the wallet over time, the Corolla Cross is the smarter, safer bet.
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you want maximum space and minimum spend — just don’t expect leather and laser-cut precision.
Honda ZR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
ZR-V
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 40400 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
130 - 132 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
57 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1660 - 1710 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
370 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4568 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1840 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1613 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
1291 - 1312 L
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
440 - 455 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
-
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
173 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
315 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
135 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1993 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Honda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and driving pep, but the Kodiaq will still win the school run.
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a boot that could double as a small country.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing to families who prioritize comfort and adaptability. Both models offer distinct strengths, making the choice between them a matter of individual lifestyle needs and preferences.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
What drivetrain options does the Honda ZR-V have?

The Honda ZR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.