VS

Hyundai i30 Wagon vs Mazda CX-30 – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai i30 Wagon or Mazda CX-30?

i30 Wagon @ hyundai.news

Hyundai i30 Kombi vs. Mazda CX-30: A Clash of Styles and Functionality

In the ever-evolving world of automobiles, two contenders stand out in their respective categories: the Hyundai i30 Kombi and the Mazda CX-30. Both vehicles offer unique attributes and features that make them noteworthy in their class. In this article, we will compare these models based on performance, design, innovation, and practicality.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Performance and Power

The Hyundai i30 Kombi boasts a range of engine options, including Petrol and Petrol MHEV variants, delivering power outputs of 100 to 140 HP. It is available in both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions and comes with front-wheel drive. With a maximum speed of up to 197 km/h and 0-100 km/h acceleration in as quick as 9.8 seconds, it strikes a balance between efficiency and dynamism.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 offers a more potent engine lineup, with power outputs reaching 186 HP. It provides both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to various driving preferences. The CX-30 shines in acceleration, capable of sprinting from 0-100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds, and reaching a top speed of 204 km/h, delivering a sportier drive compared to the i30 Kombi.

i30 Wagon @ hyundai.news

Design and Dimensions

The i30 Kombi sports a classic wagon silhouette, measuring 4585 mm in length, which provides ample space for both passengers and cargo. With a trunk capacity of 602 liters, it is an ideal choice for those who prioritize practicality and storage.

Conversely, the Mazda CX-30's SUV design is a testament to modern sophistication. It measures 4395 mm in length, slightly shorter than the i30 Kombi, yet it impresses with a stylish and robust appearance. The CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 430 liters, which, while smaller, caters well to daily needs and urban lifestyles.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel efficiency is a critical factor for many buyers. The i30 Kombi presents a consumption ranging from 5.6 to 5.9 L/100 km, coupled with CO2 emissions between 126 and 133 g/km, aligning with the D class in CO2 efficiency.

Meanwhile, the CX-30's consumption varies from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, and its CO2 emissions range from 129 to 148 g/km, also primarily falling under the D efficiency class, though some variants may lean towards E. While both vehicles perform commendably in this domain, the i30 Kombi marginally edges out with lower overall emissions.

i30 Wagon @ hyundai.news

Technological Advancements and Comfort

Hyundai has equipped the i30 Kombi with a suite of modern technologies such as a user-friendly infotainment system, advanced safety features, and driver aids, enhancing the driving experience.

The Mazda CX-30 similarly impresses with its rich array of tech offerings, including a cutting-edge infotainment system, top-tier safety solutions, and a commitment to comfort and driver engagement, thanks to intuitive controls and premium materials.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Conclusion: Choosing Your Ideal Match

Ultimately, the choice between the Hyundai i30 Kombi and the Mazda CX-30 lies in your preference for style and functionality. The i30 Kombi excels in practicality, cargo space, and efficiency, making it a reliable companion for families and anyone needing additional room. Conversely, the CX-30 offers more power, a sportier drive, and a sleek design that appeals to those seeking an adventurous yet sophisticated SUV experience.

Both models exhibit unique strengths that cater to different aspects of driving pleasure, ensuring that whether your journey is to the heart of the city or the open roads, you'll find a fitting partner in either the i30 Kombi or the CX-30.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

i30 Wagon @ hyundai.news

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Hyundai i30 Wagon has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £. That’s a price difference of around 386 £.

Both cars consume an average of 5.70 L per 100 km – no difference here.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 has a noticeable edge – offering 186 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Hyundai i30 Wagon takes 9.80 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-30 performs minimal better – reaching 204 km/h, while the Hyundai i30 Wagon tops out at 197 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hyundai i30 Wagon pulls barely noticeable stronger with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm difference.

i30 Wagon @ hyundai.news

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Hyundai i30 Wagon is slightly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1455 kg. The difference is around 139 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Hyundai i30 Wagon offers distinct more room – 602 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Hyundai i30 Wagon performs somewhat better – up to 1650 L, which is about 244 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Hyundai i30 Wagon hardly perceptible takes the win – 524 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-30 proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-30 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £25,200
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Hyundai i30 Wagon

The Hyundai i30 Wagon offers a blend of practicality and style, making it a popular choice for families and those in need of extra space. Its sleek exterior and comfortable interior provide a pleasant driving experience, while advanced safety features ensure peace of mind on the road. The i30 Wagon stands out with its impressive fuel efficiency and reliability, catering to both urban and rural lifestyles.

details
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_035 @ hyundai.news
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_040 @ hyundai.news
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_014 @ hyundai.news
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_070 @ hyundai.news
Hyundai_i30_Kombi_076 @ hyundai.news

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Hyundai i30 Wagon
Mazda CX-30
i30 Wagon
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 30100 £
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
130 - 136 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1461 kg
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity
602 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
4585 mm
Length
4395 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1795 mm
Height
1475 mm
Height
1540 mm
Max trunk capacity
1650 L
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Payload
439 - 524 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 140 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.8 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
178 - 197 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Torque
172 - 253 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 103 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1482 cm3
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Hyundai i30 Wagon
Kia Ceed Sportswagon
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Hyundai i30 Kombi takes on the Kia Ceed Sportswagon, both offering impressive versatility for family and leisure use. The i30 Kombi stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, while the Ceed Sportswagon impresses with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two compelling contenders will come down to personal preference and brand loyalty.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
What drivetrain options does the Hyundai i30 Wagon have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.