Compare performance (150 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (25,400 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai i30 Wagon or Mazda CX-30?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of automobiles, two contenders stand out in their respective categories: the Hyundai i30 Kombi and the Mazda CX-30. Both vehicles offer unique attributes and features that make them noteworthy in their class. In this article, we will compare these models based on performance, design, innovation, and practicality.
The Hyundai i30 Kombi boasts a range of engine options, including Petrol and Petrol MHEV variants, delivering power outputs of 100 to 140 HP. It is available in both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions and comes with front-wheel drive. With a maximum speed of up to 197 km/h and 0-100 km/h acceleration in as quick as 9.8 seconds, it strikes a balance between efficiency and dynamism.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 offers a more potent engine lineup, with power outputs reaching 186 HP. It provides both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options, catering to various driving preferences. The CX-30 shines in acceleration, capable of sprinting from 0-100 km/h in just 8.3 seconds, and reaching a top speed of 204 km/h, delivering a sportier drive compared to the i30 Kombi.
The i30 Kombi sports a classic wagon silhouette, measuring 4585 mm in length, which provides ample space for both passengers and cargo. With a trunk capacity of 602 liters, it is an ideal choice for those who prioritize practicality and storage.
Conversely, the Mazda CX-30's SUV design is a testament to modern sophistication. It measures 4395 mm in length, slightly shorter than the i30 Kombi, yet it impresses with a stylish and robust appearance. The CX-30 offers a trunk capacity of 430 liters, which, while smaller, caters well to daily needs and urban lifestyles.
Fuel efficiency is a critical factor for many buyers. The i30 Kombi presents a consumption ranging from 5.6 to 5.9 L/100 km, coupled with CO2 emissions between 126 and 133 g/km, aligning with the D class in CO2 efficiency.
Meanwhile, the CX-30's consumption varies from 5.7 to 6.6 L/100 km, and its CO2 emissions range from 129 to 148 g/km, also primarily falling under the D efficiency class, though some variants may lean towards E. While both vehicles perform commendably in this domain, the i30 Kombi marginally edges out with lower overall emissions.
Hyundai has equipped the i30 Kombi with a suite of modern technologies such as a user-friendly infotainment system, advanced safety features, and driver aids, enhancing the driving experience.
The Mazda CX-30 similarly impresses with its rich array of tech offerings, including a cutting-edge infotainment system, top-tier safety solutions, and a commitment to comfort and driver engagement, thanks to intuitive controls and premium materials.
Ultimately, the choice between the Hyundai i30 Kombi and the Mazda CX-30 lies in your preference for style and functionality. The i30 Kombi excels in practicality, cargo space, and efficiency, making it a reliable companion for families and anyone needing additional room. Conversely, the CX-30 offers more power, a sportier drive, and a sleek design that appeals to those seeking an adventurous yet sophisticated SUV experience.
Both models exhibit unique strengths that cater to different aspects of driving pleasure, ensuring that whether your journey is to the heart of the city or the open roads, you'll find a fitting partner in either the i30 Kombi or the CX-30.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Hyundai i30 Wagon is only slightly cheaper – starting at 25,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 291 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Hyundai i30 Wagon with 5.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers somewhat more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Hyundai i30 Wagon takes 9.1 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hyundai i30 Wagon delivers barely more torque with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Hyundai i30 Wagon is marginally lighter – 1,340 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Hyundai i30 Wagon offers noticeably more boot space – 602 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries marginally more – 496 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
The Mazda CX-30 leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Hyundai i30 Wagon is a practical family hauler that pairs roomy, sensible packaging with clean, modern lines and a surprisingly composed chassis. Comfortable, well-equipped and priced to make rivals sweat, it quietly ticks the boxes for daily life and weekend escapes while still managing a little grin on twisty roads.
details
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,400 - 32,300 £
|
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.9 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
134 - 142 g/km
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,340 - 1,460 kg
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
602 L
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 490 kg
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
172 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España