Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (23100 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Skoda Enyaq?
Kona
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Hyundai Kona has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 38100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15000 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Hyundai Kona: with 14.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Skoda Enyaq with 14.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq performs a bit better – achieving up to 587 km, about 73 km more than the Hyundai Kona.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq has a noticeable edge – offering 340 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 7.80 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Hyundai Kona performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Enyaq pulls clearly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 414 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kona
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Hyundai Kona is significantly lighter – 1370 kg compared to 2002 kg. The difference is around 632 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers evident more room – 585 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 119 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs evident better – up to 1710 L, which is about 410 L more than the Hyundai Kona.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Enyaq hardly perceptible takes the win – 509 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £38,100
Skoda Enyaq
Hyundai Kona
5 (1 Reviews)
The Hyundai Kona wears its personality on the outside with bold styling and sprightly handling that turns city driving into something a little more fun than a commute. It blends practical space, modern tech and sensible running costs into a compact, stylish package — a smart pick if you want flair without paying luxury prices.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23100 - 41600 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
377 - 514 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 65.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 163 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
38 - 47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1370 - 1773 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4350 - 4385 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1580 - 1585 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1300 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
420 - 490 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 - 11.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
162 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
85 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
998 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C, E, F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Hyundai
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Is the Hyundai Kona offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.