VS

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (204 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Kona or Skoda Enyaq?

Hyundai Kona vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Hyundai Kona

4.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kona

A Riveting Rivalry: Hyundai Kona vs. Skoda Enyaq

The automotive world is rife with competition, especially when it comes to the realm of compact SUVs. Today, the spotlight is on two impressive contenders: the Hyundai Kona and the Skoda Enyaq. Both vehicles bring a mix of style, technology, and performance to the table, but how do they stack up against each other? Let's dive into the details to find out.

Enyaq

Body and Build

Both the Hyundai Kona and the Skoda Enyaq are classified as SUVs, but their dimensions and build set them apart. The Kona is slightly more compact with lengths ranging from 4,350 to 4,385 mm, making it a nimble choice for urban environments. In contrast, the Enyaq is more generous in length, spanning up to 4,658 mm, offering a roomier interior and a robust presence on the road.

The Enyaq steals the show with its trunk capacity of up to 585 liters, compared to the Kona's 466 liters, making it a compelling choice for those who prioritize cargo space. Both vehicles offer excellent payload capacities, with the Enyaq slightly ahead at 516 kg compared to the Kona's maximum of 490 kg.

Kona

Performance and Power

Under the hood, the Kona is diverse, offering petrol, full hybrid, and electric powertrains. The petrol and hybrid engines range from 100 to 170 HP, while the electric version peaks at 218 HP. This versatility allows drivers to choose based on their driving preferences and environmental considerations.

Meanwhile, the Enyaq is solely electric, equipped with powerful motors offering up to 340 HP. With a maximum torque of 679 Nm, it promises brisk acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 5.5 seconds, which is significantly quicker than the Kona's 7.8 seconds. Both models ensure environmentally-friendly driving with CO2 emissions standing at zero for their electric variants.

Enyaq

Efficiency and Range

The Hyundai Kona's electric version boasts an admirable range between 377 km and 514 km, depending on the configuration, using a battery capacity of up to 65.4 kWh. Its consumption rates are competitive, ranging from 14.6 to 16.8 kWh/100 km.

The Skoda Enyaq ups the ante with a maximum electric range of 587 km, leveraging a 77 kWh battery. Its energy consumption is slightly varied, mostly hovering around 15 kWh/100 km, making it an economical choice for those long drives.

Kona

Technological Innovation

Both SUVs are equipped with the latest technological advancements. The Kona offers a variety of transmission options, including both manual and automatic gearboxes, targeting different driver preferences. Hyundai's connectivity features and driver-assist systems ensure a modern driving experience.

On the technology front, the Enyaq does not fall short. As a purely electric vehicle, it incorporates state-of-the-art charging solutions and infotainment features tailored for tech-savvy users. Its emphasis on sustainable driving is echoed in its excellent CO2 efficiency, maintaining class-A ratings across the board.

Enyaq

Conclusion

The Hyundai Kona and Skoda Enyaq both offer compelling packages tailored to different needs. The Kona appeals to a broad demographic with its versatile powertrain options and compact design, making it ideal for urban dwellers. The Enyaq, on the other hand, leads with its extended range, powerful performance, and spacious design, appealing to those looking for a substantial yet efficient electric SUV.

In the electric revolution of the automotive world, both the Kona and Enyaq are robust competitors, each carving out its niche with unique strengths. Whether it’s the dynamic versatility of the Hyundai Kona or the powerful efficiency of the Skoda Enyaq, both represent forward-thinking innovation in the SUV segment.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kona

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Hyundai Kona is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,277 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Hyundai Kona is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.3 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 79 km more than the Hyundai Kona.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Hyundai Kona takes 8.1 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 414 Nm more.

Kona

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Kona is clearly lighter – 1,370 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 704 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers clearly more boot space – 585 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 119 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries only slightly more – 526 kg compared to 490 kg. That’s a difference of about 36 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Hyundai Kona

The Hyundai Kona is a compact crossover that pairs bold styling with practical everyday usability, offering a comfortable cabin and intuitive tech for modern drivers. Available in both conventional and electrified versions, Kona brings lively handling and strong value for buyers who want crossover versatility and standout character.

details

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
Hyundai Kona
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,600 - 41,900 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
380 - 510 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 163 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,370 - 1,773 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,825 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
420 - 490 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 204 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, F, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Skoda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.