VS

Jaguar E-Pace vs Volvo XC40 – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Volvo XC40?

E-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Jaguar E-Pace vs Volvo XC40: A Clash of Compact Luxury SUVs

The compact luxury SUV segment has seen intense competition, and two standout contenders are the Jaguar E-Pace and the Volvo XC40. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, technology, and performance, but they cater to different preferences. In this article, we will delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both models to help buyers make an informed choice.

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Design and Dimensions: Elegant Versus Functional

When it comes to design, the Jaguar E-Pace exudes a sporty and dynamic presence. With a length of 4395 mm and a width of 1984 mm, it conveys a sense of power and agility. The vehicle stands 1648 mm tall, providing a commanding view of the road. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 measures slightly longer at 4425 mm, while its width is narrower at 1863 mm, giving it a more compact and urban-friendly profile. The XC40's height of 1652 mm adds to its robust stance, which is characteristic of Volvo's design philosophy.

E-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Performance and Engine Options

Performance is where both vehicles differentiate themselves significantly. The Jaguar E-Pace offers a range of engines, including a plug-in hybrid variant and MHEV options, providing a power output between 160 to 269 HP. It boasts various drive types, including all-wheel drive for those seeking enhanced traction, alongside fuel consumption ranging from a mere 1.4 L/100 km in hybrid mode to around 8.2 L/100 km in petrol variants.

The Volvo XC40, on the other hand, focuses solely on petrol MHEV engines. With a maximum output of 197 HP and a more modest fuel consumption of about 6.5 L/100 km, it prioritizes efficiency. The XC40 is equipped with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing smooth and responsive shifts during an engaging driving experience.

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Acceleration and Top Speed: Pushing the Limits

For those who crave speed, the Jaguar E-Pace takes the upper hand with an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds in its most powerful configuration. Its top speed also impressively reaches 211 km/h, cementing its status as a sporty SUV. The XC40, while competent, falls short with an acceleration time of 7.6 to 8.6 seconds, and a top speed of 180 km/h.

E-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Interior Comfort and Technology

Both the E-Pace and XC40 offer premium interiors designed for maximum comfort and technology integration. The E-Pace supports five seats and boasts a trunk capacity of 494 liters, making it quite versatile for storage. The cabin features high-quality materials and cutting-edge infotainment systems, easily navigable via touchscreens.

The Volvo XC40 also seats five comfortably but has a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 452 liters. The interior focus is on minimalist Scandinavian design, with an emphasis on user-friendly technology. Volvo's infotainment system is intuitive, which enhances the driving experience overall.

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Safety Innovations

Safety is paramount, and both brands have equipped their vehicles with advanced safety features. The XC40 shines with its array of driver assistance technologies, including a semi-autonomous driving feature that adds to its appeal for safety-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Jaguar E-Pace integrates various innovative safety systems, ensuring that passengers are protected on all fronts.

E-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Conclusion: Choosing Your Champion

In conclusion, the choice between the Jaguar E-Pace and the Volvo XC40 hinges on the buyer's needs and preferences. The E-Pace is the sportier option with powerful engines and a dynamic design, ideal for those prioritizing performance. Conversely, the XC40 excels in efficiency, advanced safety features, and a modern interior, appealing to buyers who value a balanced approach to luxury SUV ownership. Whichever you choose, both vehicles undoubtedly represent the best in their class.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jaguar E-Pace has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 32400 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 4362 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar E-Pace manages with 1.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 5.10 L per 100 km.

E-Pace @ media.jaguar.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar E-Pace has a evident edge – offering 269 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar E-Pace is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Jaguar E-Pace performs to a small extent better – reaching 211 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar E-Pace pulls clearly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 240 Nm difference.

XC40 @ media.volvocars.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is minimal lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1783 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Jaguar E-Pace offers minimal more room – 494 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs a bit better – up to 1328 L, which is about 158 L more than the Jaguar E-Pace.

When it comes to payload, Jaguar E-Pace barely noticeable takes the win – 554 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Jaguar E-Pace proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Jaguar E-Pace is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £32,400
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_8342

Jaguar E-Pace

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 69 km
details

Jaguar E-Pace

The Jaguar E-Pace is a compact SUV that combines the brand's signature luxury with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek design features graceful lines and an assertive stance, making it a standout on any road. Inside, the E-Pace boasts a meticulously crafted interior with high-quality materials and advanced technology, providing both comfort and connectivity for drivers and passengers alike.

details
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_8342 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_0067 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_100321_7835 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_Interior_100321_6884 @ media.jaguar.com
Jag_E-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Yulong_White_Loadspace_100321_1072 @ media.jaguar.com

Volvo XC40

5 (1)
rate

The Volvo XC40 is a standout model in the compact SUV segment, offering a delightful blend of Scandinavian design and practicality. Its interior is both stylish and functional, featuring premium materials and innovative storage solutions that make every journey comfortable. The car's performance is smooth and responsive, with advanced safety features ensuring peace of mind for drivers and passengers alike.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ media.volvocars.com
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ media.volvocars.com
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a plush cabin, class-leading safety tech and Scandinavian style, so pay extra if you want flair, refinement and that "I’m-driving-something-special" feeling.
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go Kuga; if you prefer a calmer, premium feel and a car that looks after you like a very fashionable safety blanket, choose the XC40.
Jaguar E-Pace
Volvo XC40
E-Pace
XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
32400 - 56100 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
69 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
33 - 185 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1783 - 2173 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
494 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1984 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1648 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1170 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
497 - 554 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more personality for less cash.
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V stands out for its versatile cargo space and user-friendly technology, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced safety features, appealing to those seeking luxury and peace of mind. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether practicality or premium comfort takes precedence in your driving experience.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
CUPRA Terramar
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, catering to different preferences in the increasingly popular market.
Toyota Corolla Cross
Volvo XC40
VS
The Toyota Corolla Cross is the sensible, wallet-friendly compact SUV that delivers Toyota reliability, efficient engines and roomy practicality for everyday life, while the Volvo XC40 trades bargain-basement charm for premium materials, sharper handling and a cocoon of Scandinavian safety tech. If you want low running costs and uncomplicated usefulness, the Corolla Cross is your no-nonsense winner; if you prefer style, advanced driver aids and a badge that subtly screams “I care about safety (and design),” splurge on the XC40.
Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether buyers prioritize style and affordability or luxury and innovation.
CUPRA Formentor
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a reputation for safety and comfort. Ultimately, the decision between these two distinctive models hinges on personal preferences for driving engagement versus everyday usability.
What drive types are available for the Jaguar E-Pace?

The Jaguar E-Pace is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.