Compare performance (269 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (32,400 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar E-Pace or Volvo XC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact luxury SUV segment has seen intense competition, and two standout contenders are the Jaguar E-Pace and the Volvo XC40. Both vehicles offer a blend of style, technology, and performance, but they cater to different preferences. In this article, we will delve into the technical aspects and innovations of both models to help buyers make an informed choice.
When it comes to design, the Jaguar E-Pace exudes a sporty and dynamic presence. With a length of 4395 mm and a width of 1984 mm, it conveys a sense of power and agility. The vehicle stands 1648 mm tall, providing a commanding view of the road. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 measures slightly longer at 4425 mm, while its width is narrower at 1863 mm, giving it a more compact and urban-friendly profile. The XC40's height of 1652 mm adds to its robust stance, which is characteristic of Volvo's design philosophy.
Performance is where both vehicles differentiate themselves significantly. The Jaguar E-Pace offers a range of engines, including a plug-in hybrid variant and MHEV options, providing a power output between 160 to 269 HP. It boasts various drive types, including all-wheel drive for those seeking enhanced traction, alongside fuel consumption ranging from a mere 1.4 L/100 km in hybrid mode to around 8.2 L/100 km in petrol variants.
The Volvo XC40, on the other hand, focuses solely on petrol MHEV engines. With a maximum output of 197 HP and a more modest fuel consumption of about 6.5 L/100 km, it prioritizes efficiency. The XC40 is equipped with a dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing smooth and responsive shifts during an engaging driving experience.
For those who crave speed, the Jaguar E-Pace takes the upper hand with an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 7.3 seconds in its most powerful configuration. Its top speed also impressively reaches 211 km/h, cementing its status as a sporty SUV. The XC40, while competent, falls short with an acceleration time of 7.6 to 8.6 seconds, and a top speed of 180 km/h.
Both the E-Pace and XC40 offer premium interiors designed for maximum comfort and technology integration. The E-Pace supports five seats and boasts a trunk capacity of 494 liters, making it quite versatile for storage. The cabin features high-quality materials and cutting-edge infotainment systems, easily navigable via touchscreens.
The Volvo XC40 also seats five comfortably but has a slightly smaller trunk capacity of 452 liters. The interior focus is on minimalist Scandinavian design, with an emphasis on user-friendly technology. Volvo's infotainment system is intuitive, which enhances the driving experience overall.
Safety is paramount, and both brands have equipped their vehicles with advanced safety features. The XC40 shines with its array of driver assistance technologies, including a semi-autonomous driving feature that adds to its appeal for safety-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Jaguar E-Pace integrates various innovative safety systems, ensuring that passengers are protected on all fronts.
In conclusion, the choice between the Jaguar E-Pace and the Volvo XC40 hinges on the buyer's needs and preferences. The E-Pace is the sportier option with powerful engines and a dynamic design, ideal for those prioritizing performance. Conversely, the XC40 excels in efficiency, advanced safety features, and a modern interior, appealing to buyers who value a balanced approach to luxury SUV ownership. Whichever you choose, both vehicles undoubtedly represent the best in their class.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jaguar E-Pace is noticeably cheaper – starting at 32,400 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,505 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jaguar E-Pace uses 1.4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 5.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar E-Pace offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar E-Pace is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar E-Pace delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 240 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is very slightly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 1,783 kg. The difference is around 95 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Jaguar E-Pace carries very slightly more – 554 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.
The Jaguar E-Pace is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jaguar E-Pace brings compact SUV practicality together with taut, sporty design and unmistakable British charm, helping it stand out in a crowded class. Inside, the cabin feels premium and the driving manners are engaging enough to keep a grin on your face, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want Jaguar style without the bulk.
details
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
32,400 - 56,100 £
|
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.5 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
33 - 185 g/km
|
co2
148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 67 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,783 - 2,173 kg
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
494 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,984 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
1,648 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,170 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
497 - 554 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 10.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 211 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España