What drive types are available for the Jaguar F-Pace?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Jaguar F-Pace deliver on the road?

The Jaguar F-Pace reaches a peak output of 575 HP, depending on the model.

How much fuel does the Jaguar F-Pace use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 1.80 L.

How many kWh does the Jaguar F-Pace’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 15.40 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Jaguar F-Pace?

Depending on the model, top speed is 286 km/h.

What are the Jaguar F-Pace’s length, width and height?

Length 4747 mm, width 1936 mm, height 1664 mm – those are the dimensions of the Jaguar F-Pace.

What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mazda CX-30's engine?

The Mazda CX-30 reaches a peak output of 186 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-30 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.70 L.

How fast can the Mazda CX-30 go?

Depending on the model, top speed is 204 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Mazda CX-30?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 is 4395 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1540 mm high.

Jaguar F-Pace vs Mazda CX-30 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56400 £. That’s a price difference of around 31166 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Jaguar F-Pace manages with 1.80 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 3.90 L per 100 km.

CX-30 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace has a convincingly edge – offering 575 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 389 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar F-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Jaguar F-Pace performs evident better – reaching 286 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 82 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Jaguar F-Pace pulls clearly stronger with 700 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 460 Nm difference.

F-Pace @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is distinct lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1951 kg. The difference is around 496 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Jaguar F-Pace offers minimal more room – 470 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Jaguar F-Pace performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1428 L, which is about 22 L more than the Mazda CX-30.

When it comes to payload, Jaguar F-Pace somewhat takes the win – 589 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Jaguar F-Pace shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Mazda CX-30

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

VS

The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Formentor

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-30

VS

The CUPRA Formentor and Mazda CX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.

Costs and Consumption
Price 56400 - 100800 £	Price 25200 - 36800 £
Consumption L/100km 1.8 - 12 L	Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 64 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 15.40 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 41 - 274 g/km	co2 129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 62 - 83 L	Fuel tank capacity 48 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1951 - 2230 kg	Curb weight 1455 - 1587 kg
Trunk capacity 354 - 470 L	Trunk capacity 422 - 430 L
Length 4747 - 4762 mm	Length 4395 mm
Width 1936 mm	Width 1795 mm
Height 1664 - 1670 mm	Height 1540 mm
Max trunk capacity 1299 - 1428 L	Max trunk capacity 1398 - 1406 L
Payload 457 - 589 kg	Payload 458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 163 - 575 HP	Power HP 140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4 - 10.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed 195 - 286 km/h	Max Speed 191 - 204 km/h
Torque 380 - 700 Nm	Torque 238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 8	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 120 - 423 kW	Power kW 103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity 1997 - 5000 cm3	Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3