VS

Jaguar F-Pace vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (575 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (56,400 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar F-Pace or Volvo EX30?

Jaguar F-Pace vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Volvo EX30

3.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

F-Pace

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo EX30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Jaguar F-Pace costs 56,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,409 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 475 km, about 411 km more than the Jaguar F-Pace.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar F-Pace offers visibly more power – delivering 575 HP compared to 428 HP. That’s roughly 147 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Jaguar F-Pace takes 4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar F-Pace delivers visibly more torque with 700 Nm compared to 543 Nm. That’s about 157 Nm more.

F-Pace

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX30 is barely lighter – 1,840 kg compared to 1,951 kg. The difference is around 111 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jaguar F-Pace offers clearly more boot space – 470 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 152 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jaguar F-Pace carries markedly more – 589 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 199 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 339 - 475 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Kia EV2
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Kia EV2 are compact electric crossovers that balance urban-friendly size with modern tech, safety systems, and strong value propositions. This comparison focuses on range, performance, interior quality, and ownership costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX40 helps buyers choose between a compact, city-focused electric crossover and a slightly larger, more practical electric SUV. The EX30 prioritises agility, lower cost and urban ease, while the EX40 offers more interior space, range and family-friendly …
Jaguar F-Pace
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jaguar F-Pace

Jaguar F-Pace blends the prowling presence of a sports car with the practicality of an SUV, looking elegant while rewarding drivers with lively handling. If you crave something that feels special every time you climb in and prefer style and driving flair over blending into the parking lot, the F-Pace is a classy, slightly cheeky alternative to the usual German suspects.

details
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8839
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8069
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Portrait_100321_8105
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Interior_100321_9682
Jag_F-PACE_PHEV_21MY_Portofino_Blue_Loadspace_100321_5938

Reviews Jaguar F-Pace

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Frank
23 Dec 2025, 16:34:38

Really nice car with good multimedia features and a solid sound system. Great for long trips — not tiring to drive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is a compact all-electric crossover that mixes Volvo's strong safety focus with clean Scandinavian design for a really city-friendly package. It feels lively and easy to live with, pairing a premium-feeling interior and modern connectivity with a practical footprint for urban driving.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
V
8 Jun 2026, 10:03:34

Very disappointing overall for a car that comes to €57,500 with options.
After 27,000 km in it over 2 years — so many disappointments...
Despite Volvo’s updates, many “small” problems that ruin daily life:

Mirrors that desynchronize and reset when you open the car.
With the keyless option the car sometimes unlocks when you’re at a distance but won’t open when you try the door.
Intrusive driver aids that become dangerous: they slam the brakes when detecting phantom vehicles while reversing (with a wall behind) or detect vehicles in the lane to our left as a “vehicle coming from the left” (same in roundabouts).
Same issue when overtaking: it lets you pass without problem but then abruptly pushes you back into oncoming traffic when you cross the line to move over.
Screen that stays black or frozen for several tens of seconds at startup.
Performance drops sharply once battery falls below 60%.

Handling is rather mixed: very good when it was new, after two years it develops body roll, tends to overreact in corners (it bounces), and loses grip at the front in roundabouts (for a rear-wheel-drive…).

The engine is overall pleasant and powerful, but the chassis does not at all match the 272 hp.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Maes Ivo
13 May 2026, 21:43:53

Volvo EX30 twin performance is een super handige compacte auto die vast op de weg ligt . Is pijlsnel en je zit iets hoger. Interieur went snel . Ik heb er zelf eentje en ben er verliefd op . Heb BMW G30 gehad . Fantastische auto , maar groot en onhandig . Geef mij maar de Volvo en we zijn maar met 2 .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
Volvo EX30
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Volvo EX30 and CUPRA Raval are compact premium electric crossovers that take very different approaches to design, tech and driving character. Choosing between them comes down to whether you value Volvo’s safety-focused simplicity and efficient range or CUPRA’s sportier styling and …
Volvo EX30
VW ID.Polo
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volkswagen ID. Polo show two different philosophies for compact electrics: the EX30 emphasizes sporty performance, advanced safety and premium Scandinavian design, while the ID. Polo focuses on everyday practicality, value and efficient city driving. We'll compare range, …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX30 and EX60 represent two different takes on Volvo’s electric SUV lineup: the EX30 is a compact, city-focused, entry-level EV while the EX60 is a larger, mid-size option that emphasizes space, range and family comfort. This comparison cuts through specs and real-world strengths so you …
Volvo EX30
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the compact, tech-forward Volvo EX30 with the practical, value-driven Skoda Elroq highlights two different takes on the modern small SUV: the EX30 leans into agile electric performance and premium safety and tech, while the Elroq prioritizes roomy practicality and everyday versatility. …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX30
VS
Deciding between the Ford Explorer EV and the Volvo EX30 is essentially choosing between roomy, family-focused SUV capability and a compact, premium electric that prioritizes agility and efficiency. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, tech, practicality and value to help you pick the best EV for …
Lexus LBX
Volvo EX30
VS
Lexus LBX and Volvo EX30 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Lexus LBX or the Volvo EX30 …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 pit a compact, city-focused electric with lively handling against a larger, comfort-oriented electric aimed at family use. This comparison highlights key differences in range, interior space, driving feel and tech to help you choose which suits your needs.
Jaguar F-Pace
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
56,400 - 100,800 £
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.8 - 12 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
Battery Capacity
15.4 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 274 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,951 - 2,230 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 470 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
4,747 - 4,762 mm
Length
-
Width
1,936 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
1,664 - 1,670 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,299 - 1,428 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 589 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 575 HP
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
195 - 286 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 700 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
120 - 423 kW
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 - 5,000 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Jaguar
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Jaguar F-Pace have?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.