Compare performance (156 HP vs 449 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or BYD Atto 3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive landscape has never been more thrilling with the escalating competition among electric vehicles (EVs). Today, we're diving deep into a comparison between two noteworthy models: BYD Atto 3 and Jeep Avenger. Both vehicles cater to a similar audience with their SUV body types and electric powertrains but differ significantly in terms of technical prowess and innovations.
The BYD Atto 3 leads with an electric motor delivering 204 HP and 150 kW of power, boasting a torque of 310 Nm. It can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds, appealing to those who crave prompt responses and smooth driving experiences. This SUV also reaches a maximum speed of 160 km/h which ensures it handles both city and highway driving with competence.
In contrast, the Jeep Avenger offers a variety of engine types, including an electric motor option producing 156 HP and 115 kW of power with a torque output of 260 Nm. The Avenger's electric variant achieves 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 9 seconds and can attain a peak speed of 150 km/h, offering a slightly milder performance yet still efficient for everyday needs.
The BYD Atto 3 triumphs in terms of electric range, offering up to 420 km on a full charge with a consumption of 16 kWh/100km. This efficiency ensures longer drives without frequent charging stops, making it an ideal partner for long-distance travels.
Meanwhile, the Jeep Avenger electric variant provides a range of up to 400 km, with a slightly lower consumption rate of 15.4 kWh/100km. While it falls slightly short in range compared to the Atto 3, it compensates with its versatility of being available in other fuel engine configurations, catering to a broader spectrum of user needs.
Inside, the BYD Atto 3 is spacious, offering a trunk capacity of 440 liters and a payload of 335 kg. It accommodates five seats comfortably, ensuring ample room for passengers and cargo alike, perfect for family adventures.
The Jeep Avenger, slightly more compact with a trunk capacity ranging from 325 to 380 liters depending on the variant, provides a higher payload capacity of up to 502 kg. Although it offers less trunk space, its payload advantage might appeal to those requiring more hauling capability for personal or professional activities.
The BYD Atto 3 measures 4455 mm in length, 1875 mm in width, and 1615 mm in height, providing a robust road presence that's typical of an SUV. Its dimensions promote a spacious interior and ensure stability and confidence on the road.
The Jeep Avenger is compact, measuring between 4084 mm in length, 1776 mm in width, and height variations up to 1536 mm. Its compact nature enhances urban maneuverability, making it a compelling choice for city dwellers needing an efficient and versatile vehicle.
Both the BYD Atto 3 and Jeep Avenger showcase the evolution of electric mobility with their distinct offerings. For those prioritizing range, acceleration, and interior space, the Atto 3 stands out. However, the Avenger's flexibility with multiple powertrain options and higher payload might appeal to consumers seeking versatility and efficiency in different driving conditions.
Ultimately, the choice between these two electric SUVs will depend on individual preferences and lifestyle requirements, making both models exciting choices in the expanding electric vehicle market.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Jeep Avenger is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,020 £.
As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers markedly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 110 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers substantially more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 293 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers considerably more torque with 560 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
The BYD Atto 3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.
details
The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
|
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
BYD
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España