VS

Jeep Avenger vs KGM Musso EV comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or KGM Musso EV?

Jeep Avenger vs KGM Musso EV: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

KGM Musso EV

  • significantly more power
  • only slightly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jeep Avenger is significantly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the KGM Musso EV costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,449 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Jeep Avenger is clearly more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 23 kWh/100km for the KGM Musso EV. That’s a difference of about 7.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 20 km more than the Jeep Avenger.

Musso EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers significantly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 258 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the KGM Musso EV is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Musso EV delivers substantially more torque with 678 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 418 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is clearly lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 985 kg.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries substantially more – 905 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 403 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Musso EV holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
Musso EV

KGM Musso EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 - 414 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 23 - 26 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 379 - 420 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Jeep Avenger
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

KGM Musso EV

The Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.

details
serpimg_XBhXgy

Reviews KGM Musso EV

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
Comparing the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Jeep Avenger pits a classic, driver-focused Italian coupe against a contemporary, city-sized crossover built for everyday practicality. If you value vintage charisma and engaging steering, the Junior is instantly appealing; if you prefer modern safety, …
Fiat 600
Jeep Avenger
VS
Deciding between the Fiat 600 and the Jeep Avenger comes down to whether you prefer a compact, city-focused car with Italian flair or a small crossover that offers higher ground clearance and a more rugged image. This comparison will look at space, efficiency, driving feel, safety and running costs …
Jeep Avenger
Nissan Juke
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Nissan Juke comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with Jeep’s rugged styling and practical options or the Juke’s quirky, city-focused design and agile handling. Below I’ll highlight the key differences in space, performance, efficiency and …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Mokka
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Opel Mokka are two compact crossovers with very different personalities — the Avenger wears its Jeep ruggedness and EV chops on its sleeve, while the Mokka is a sharper, more urban-focused package with chic styling and a polished cabin. If you want an adventurous, value-packed …
Jeep Avenger
KGM Musso EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 502 kg
Payload
805 - 905 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Jeep
Brand
KGM
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.