Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Jeep Avenger vs Mitsubishi ASX - Differences and prices compared
Avenger
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi ASX has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Jeep Avenger costs 21900 £. That’s a price difference of around 1380 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore somewhat more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.
ASX
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a minimal edge – offering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jeep Avenger performs slight better – reaching 194 km/h, while the Mitsubishi ASX tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 14 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 270 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.
Avenger
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is hardly perceptible lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1296 kg. The difference is around 116 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers distinct more room – 484 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs to a small extent better – up to 1596 L, which is about 319 L more than the Jeep Avenger.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Avenger a bit takes the win – 502 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mitsubishi ASX shows itself to be only a minor advantage and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £20,600
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Mitsubishi ASX
Jeep Avenger
Mitsubishi ASX
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jeep Avenger
5 (2 Reviews)
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
Mitsubishi ASX
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Jeep Avenger
Mitsubishi ASX
|
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
|
@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
Price
20600 - 32500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
99 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1776 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
397 - 449 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
What drivetrain options does the Jeep Avenger have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.