VS

Jeep Avenger vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Renault Clio?

Jeep Avenger vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • barely lighter
  • slightly more trunk space

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • barely more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Avenger

The Battle of the Best: Jeep Avenger vs. Renault Clio

In the world of automotive engineering, each year brings new contenders to the road, each vying for the title of the most impressive vehicle. Today, we bring you a head-to-head comparison between two popular choices, the Jeep Avenger and the Renault Clio. These models stand out in their respective categories, the Avenger as a robust SUV and the Clio as a sleek hatchback. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations each car brings to the table.

Clio

Jeep Avenger: The Bold Adventurer

The Jeep Avenger is making waves in the SUV segment with its versatile engine options - Electric, Petrol MHEV, and Petrol. The Electric variant boasts an impressive power output of 156 HP (115 kW) making it a strong competitor for eco-conscious drivers. Remarkably, it provides a consumption rate of 15.4 kWh/100km and a full electric range of up to 400 km, demonstrating a perfect balance between performance and sustainability.

For petrol enthusiasts, the Avenger offers engines with outputs ranging from 100 HP to 136 HP, efficiently consuming between 5.4 and 5.7 L/100km. The payload and trunk capacity are particularly notable, supporting 495 kg and up to 380 liters, shaped for both comfort and cargo.

Technical highlights like the dual transmission options, available in both automatic and manual, coupled with a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive, further enhance its versatility. With a robust build, it exhibits dimensions of 4084 mm length, 1776 mm width, and up to 1536 mm in height, ensuring a commanding presence on every road.

Avenger

Renault Clio: A Symphony of Style and Efficiency

The Renault Clio, a quintessential hatchback, offers a charming fusion of style and efficiency. Known for its smooth driving experience, the Clio comes with engine options like Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG, designed to suit varied driving preferences.

With a maximum power output of 143 HP (105 kW) in its hybrid version, the Clio impressively maintains a low fuel consumption figure of 4.3 L/100km. Even with petrol variants, its fuel efficiency reaches up to 7 L/100km, highlighting its cost-effective nature. Clio's commitment to reduced emissions is evident with CO2 emissions starting as low as 97 g/km.

The Clio’s dimensions - 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height - underscore its compact yet dynamic design. It comfortably seats five while offering a trunk capacity of up to 391 liters, balancing style with practicality.

Clio

Innovation and Driving Experience

Both the Jeep Avenger and the Renault Clio are distinguished by their commitment to innovation. The Avenger’s powerful electric variants and adaptable drive features cater to the adventurous spirit, while its robust build offers an unmatched driving experience across varied terrains.

Conversely, the Clio’s hybrid technology and compact design prioritize urban agility, offering a seamless transition between power and efficiency. The Clio's lightweight build ensures agile handling and control, making it ideal for city dwellers.

Avenger

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and Renault Clio ultimately depends on your lifestyle and driving needs. The Avenger is a formidable choice for those seeking power and all-terrain versatility, backed by bold aesthetics. Conversely, the Clio offers urban sophistication with unparalleled efficiency and a design focused on versatility and sustainability.

Both vehicles embody the evolution of the automotive world, offering technologically advanced drivetrains, comfort, and safety innovations tailored to modern drivers. Whether it’s the rugged charm of the Avenger or the sleek efficiency of the Clio, each car stands as a testament to its brand’s legacy and vision.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Clio is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Jeep Avenger costs 22,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,485 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers barely more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Jeep Avenger is barely faster – reaching 194 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 14 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers markedly more torque with 260 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is barely lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers slightly more boot space – 380 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Jeep Avenger offers marginally more capacity – up to 1,277 L, about 101 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries marginally more – 502 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 400 km
details
Jeep Avenger
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
Unsure whether the Jeep Avenger or the Renault R4 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Frontera
VS
The Jeep Avenger is a cheeky, compact crossover that dresses up like an off-roader but thrives in the city — zippy, efficient and ideal if you want Jeep styling without the gas-guzzling bravado. The Opel Frontera, by contrast, is a more grown-up SUV: roomier, practical and better suited to family …
Jeep Avenger
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The all‑electric Jeep Avenger packs Jeep’s chunky styling into a city‑friendly crossover with brisk EV torque and cheeky off‑road looks — perfect for buyers who want electric motoring with attitude, even if it’s more boulevard than boulder. The Toyota Yaris Cross, meanwhile, swaps glamour for …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault Clio and Toyota Yaris both stand out in the compact car segment, each offering distinct advantages for urban driving. The Clio impresses with its stylish design and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and running costs. Meanwhile, the Yaris shines …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and …
Opel Corsa
Renault Clio
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Corsa or the Renault Clio is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Jeep Avenger
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 36,900 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,084 - 4,088 mm
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,527 - 1,541 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,218 - 1,277 L
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
494 - 502 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Renault
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.