VS

Jeep Avenger vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Renault Clio?

Jeep Avenger vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • barely lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • barely more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Avenger

The Battle of the Best: Jeep Avenger vs. Renault Clio

In the world of automotive engineering, each year brings new contenders to the road, each vying for the title of the most impressive vehicle. Today, we bring you a head-to-head comparison between two popular choices, the Jeep Avenger and the Renault Clio. These models stand out in their respective categories, the Avenger as a robust SUV and the Clio as a sleek hatchback. Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations each car brings to the table.

Clio

Jeep Avenger: The Bold Adventurer

The Jeep Avenger is making waves in the SUV segment with its versatile engine options - Electric, Petrol MHEV, and Petrol. The Electric variant boasts an impressive power output of 156 HP (115 kW) making it a strong competitor for eco-conscious drivers. Remarkably, it provides a consumption rate of 15.4 kWh/100km and a full electric range of up to 400 km, demonstrating a perfect balance between performance and sustainability.

For petrol enthusiasts, the Avenger offers engines with outputs ranging from 100 HP to 136 HP, efficiently consuming between 5.4 and 5.7 L/100km. The payload and trunk capacity are particularly notable, supporting 495 kg and up to 380 liters, shaped for both comfort and cargo.

Technical highlights like the dual transmission options, available in both automatic and manual, coupled with a choice between front-wheel and all-wheel drive, further enhance its versatility. With a robust build, it exhibits dimensions of 4084 mm length, 1776 mm width, and up to 1536 mm in height, ensuring a commanding presence on every road.

Avenger

Renault Clio: A Symphony of Style and Efficiency

The Renault Clio, a quintessential hatchback, offers a charming fusion of style and efficiency. Known for its smooth driving experience, the Clio comes with engine options like Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG, designed to suit varied driving preferences.

With a maximum power output of 143 HP (105 kW) in its hybrid version, the Clio impressively maintains a low fuel consumption figure of 4.3 L/100km. Even with petrol variants, its fuel efficiency reaches up to 7 L/100km, highlighting its cost-effective nature. Clio's commitment to reduced emissions is evident with CO2 emissions starting as low as 97 g/km.

The Clio’s dimensions - 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height - underscore its compact yet dynamic design. It comfortably seats five while offering a trunk capacity of up to 391 liters, balancing style with practicality.

Clio

Innovation and Driving Experience

Both the Jeep Avenger and the Renault Clio are distinguished by their commitment to innovation. The Avenger’s powerful electric variants and adaptable drive features cater to the adventurous spirit, while its robust build offers an unmatched driving experience across varied terrains.

Conversely, the Clio’s hybrid technology and compact design prioritize urban agility, offering a seamless transition between power and efficiency. The Clio's lightweight build ensures agile handling and control, making it ideal for city dwellers.

Avenger

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and Renault Clio ultimately depends on your lifestyle and driving needs. The Avenger is a formidable choice for those seeking power and all-terrain versatility, backed by bold aesthetics. Conversely, the Clio offers urban sophistication with unparalleled efficiency and a design focused on versatility and sustainability.

Both vehicles embody the evolution of the automotive world, offering technologically advanced drivetrains, comfort, and safety innovations tailored to modern drivers. Whether it’s the rugged charm of the Avenger or the sleek efficiency of the Clio, each car stands as a testament to its brand’s legacy and vision.

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Clio is markedly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Jeep Avenger costs 22,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,485 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Clio uses 4.1 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers barely more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers markedly more torque with 260 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is barely lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 22 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers slightly more boot space – 380 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

When it comes to payload, the Jeep Avenger carries marginally more – 502 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 400 km
details
Jeep Avenger
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Jeep Avenger
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara are two compact SUVs that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with some crossover capability — the Avenger emphasizes modern design and electrified options, while the Vitara leans on proven practicality and value. This short comparison …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Jeep Avenger
Opel Mokka
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Opel Mokka are two compact crossovers with very different personalities — the Avenger wears its Jeep ruggedness and EV chops on its sleeve, while the Mokka is a sharper, more urban-focused package with chic styling and a polished cabin. If you want an adventurous, value-packed …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Jeep Avenger
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 502 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Renault
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.