VS

Jeep Avenger vs Skoda Karoq comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 190 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Skoda Karoq?

Jeep Avenger vs Skoda Karoq: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • moderately lighter
details

Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Jeep Avenger is noticeably cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Skoda Karoq costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,540 £.

Both cars consume an average of 4.9 L/100km – no difference here.

Karoq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq offers somewhat more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers markedly more torque with 360 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is moderately lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,380 kg. The difference is around 200 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers visibly more boot space – 521 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 141 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries only slightly more – 549 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 47 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Karoq comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
Karoq

Skoda Karoq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Jeep Avenger
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4 (8 Reviews)
rate
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Karoq

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494

Reviews Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Skoda Karoq
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
We line up the Skoda Karoq against the Toyota Corolla Cross to settle which compact SUV deserves your keys. The Karoq brings clever Czech packaging and Euro finesse, while the Corolla Cross answers with Toyota’s rock‑solid reliability and wallet‑friendly running costs—so read on if you prefer …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and the Skoda Karoq is largely about whether you want a polished, tech-focused compact SUV or a straightforward, space-first family mover. Both deliver sensible packaging and efficient engines, but they differ in ride feel, interior cleverness and ownership costs …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Ford Kuga drives with a bit more panache—sharper steering, punchier engines and the kind of gadgetry that makes motorway miles fly by—while the Skoda Karoq quietly wins hearts with sensible packaging, excellent practicality and the sort of roominess that swallows weekend luggage without …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Alfa Romeo Junior emerges as a stylish contender with its sleek Italian design and sporty performance, while the Jeep Avenger boasts rugged capabilities and an adventurous spirit. The Junior appeals to enthusiasts seeking a dynamic driving experience, whereas the …
Ford Puma
Jeep Avenger
VS
Ford Puma and Jeep Avenger go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …
Jeep Avenger
Skoda Karoq

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
521 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
494 - 502 kg
Payload
456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Skoda
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.