Compare performance (156 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 29,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Subaru Crosstrek?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment has grown more competitive, with Jeep and Subaru both stepping into the arena with their newest offerings. Today, we dive deep into a head-to-head comparison of the Jeep Avenger and Subaru Crosstrek, exploring the technical aspects and innovations that make each unique.
The Jeep Avenger offers a versatile lineup with electric, petrol mild hybrid electric vehicle (MHEV), and traditional petrol engines. Its electric variant boasts 156 HP with an impressive torque of 260 Nm, allowing for a brisk 0-100 km/h acceleration in just 9 seconds. For those leaning towards the petrol options, you can expect between 100 to 136 HP, depending on your choice.
In contrast, the Subaru Crosstrek is powered by a reliable petrol MHEV engine offering 136 HP and 182 Nm of torque. Its unique CVT automatic transmission ensures a smooth driving experience, achieving 0-100 km/h in 10.8 seconds. Despite its slight lag in direct acceleration compared to the Avenger, it compensates with its all-wheel-drive capability, enhancing its off-road prowess.
Fuel conscious drivers will find the Avenger's electric version appealing, with a consumption of just 15.4 kWh/100 km and a range of 400 km on a full battery. For petrol variants, consumption spans between 5.4 to 5.7 L/100 km, keeping it efficient for longer journeys.
The Crosstrek, on the other hand, consumes 7.7 L/100 km. While its fuel consumption isn’t the best in the segment, its 48-liter fuel tank provides a decent driving range, making it less frequent to fuel stops on longer trips.
Size does matter in the SUV category. Jeep Avenger measures 4084 mm in length, 1776 mm in width, and up to 1536 mm in height, offering a trunk capacity ranging from 325 to 380 liters, catering to urban and small family needs.
Subaru’s Crosstrek runs slightly larger, with a length of 4495 mm, width of 1800 mm, and height of 1600 mm. Its trunk capacity is slightly more restrictive at 315 liters, but it makes up for it with its generous cargo arrangement and versatile space usage.
Both vehicles prioritize safety and technology. The Jeep Avenger shines with its array of electric models, promising zero emissions with a CO2 efficiency class ranging from A to C depending on the engine choice, aligning with eco-friendly aspirations.
The Subaru Crosstrek may not compete in the eco-friendliness arena with an F rating in CO2 efficiency, but it excels with its all-wheel-drive feature, providing stability and enhanced grip in various terrains and weather conditions.
The choice between the Jeep Avenger and Subaru Crosstrek depends greatly on your personal preferences and priorities. The Avenger stands out with its eco-friendly electric option and flexible engine variety, perfect for those seeking sustainable urban mobility. Meanwhile, the Crosstrek provides unmatched all-wheel-drive reliability, making it a go-to for adventure enthusiasts and those frequently braving challenging terrains.
In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, both vehicles offer compelling choices that cater to different lifestyle needs, ensuring that there’s something for everyone at the forefront of automotive innovation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger is markedly cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Subaru Crosstrek costs 29,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,278 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Avenger uses 4.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Subaru Crosstrek with 7.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Avenger offers somewhat more power – delivering 156 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Avenger is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 9 s, while the Subaru Crosstrek takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Avenger delivers markedly more torque with 260 Nm compared to 182 Nm. That’s about 78 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is noticeably lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,595 kg. The difference is around 415 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers moderately more boot space – 380 L compared to 315 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.
When it comes to payload, the Subaru Crosstrek carries very slightly more – 505 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.
The Jeep Avenger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.
details
The Subaru Crosstrek is a compact, go-anywhere crossover that blends rugged good looks with Subaru's familiar all-wheel-drive confidence, so it feels equally at home on backroads and in the supermarket car park. It delivers practical, reliable transport with a comfy ride and sensible features — not the flashiest cabin, but great for buyers who prefer substance over sparkle.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,500 - 35,000 £
|
Price
29,800 - 34,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
174 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
1,595 - 1,628 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
355 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
315 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,495 mm
|
|
Width
1,776 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,600 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,297 - 1,314 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
472 - 505 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
198 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
182 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,995 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Subaru
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España