Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Toyota C-HR?
In the ever-expanding universe of compact SUVs, two models stand out for their innovation and design: the Jeep Avenger and the Toyota C-HR. Both offer unique blends of style and technology, but how do they stack up against each other on the road? Let's dive into the details.
The Jeep Avenger offers a versatile selection of engines to suit different driving needs, including electric, petrol MHEV, and traditional petrol. This flexibility is complemented by multiple transmission options: reduction gearbox for the electric version, a dual-clutch automatic, and a manual for petrol variants. The electric Avenger achieves 156 HP and a torque of 260 Nm, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in just 9 seconds, with a top speed of 150 km/h.
Conversely, the Toyota C-HR opts for hybrid and plug-in hybrid engines, ensuring less environmental impact and impressive fuel efficiency. The power ranges from 140 to a robust 223 HP, with acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as quick as 7.4 seconds for the plug-in version. The hybrid engine is mated to a smooth CVT transmission, offering a seamless driving experience.
The electric Jeep Avenger excels with its 400 km range on a full charge, consuming 15.4 kWh/100 km. Petrol variants offer consumption rates of 5.4 to 5.7 L/100 km. The C-HR, with hybrid prowess, boasts a consumption as low as 4.7 L/100 km for the full hybrid model, while the plug-in variant reaches an impressive 0.8 L/100 km over its 67-68 km electric range.
Inside, both vehicles cater to comfort, with the Jeep Avenger offering seating for five and trunk capacities ranging from 325 to 380 liters. The C-HR, slightly longer and wider, provides a spacious feel with trunk capacities up to 447 liters, perfect for family getaways or shopping trips.
When it comes to technology, the Jeep Avenger showcases a futuristic approach, especially in its electric version, focusing on the latest enhancements in electric mobility. The Toyota C-HR, known for its hybrid innovations, comes equipped with advanced driver-assist features and a modern infotainment system.
The Avenger's electric version scores a perfect CO2 emission rate of 0 g/km while other petrol versions range from 111 to 130 g/km. On the other hand, the C-HR's hybrids impress with CO2 emissions as low as 17 g/km, underscoring Toyota's commitment to eco-friendliness.
Both the Jeep Avenger and the Toyota C-HR offer compelling options in the compact SUV segment. The Avenger stands out for its electric capabilities and rugged appeal, while the C-HR continues to lead with hybrid efficiency and technological advancements. Your choice ultimately depends on your driving preferences and environmental considerations.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Jeep Avenger has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £, while the Toyota C-HR costs 29100 £. That’s a price difference of around 7192 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.90 L. The difference is about 4.10 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Jeep Avenger performs clearly better – achieving up to 400 km, about 332 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR has a noticeable edge – offering 223 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 67 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jeep Avenger performs slight better – reaching 194 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 14 km/h.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is noticeable lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1505 kg. The difference is around 325 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers slightly more room – 447 L compared to 380 L. That’s a difference of about 67 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Avenger performs slight better – up to 1277 L, which is about 122 L more than the Toyota C-HR.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Avenger somewhat takes the win – 502 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 77 kg.
The Toyota C-HR proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Toyota C-HR is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
@ Jeep / Stellantis Media
|
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
17 - 115 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
Length
4362 mm
|
|
Width
1776 mm
|
Width
1832 mm
|
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España