VS

Jeep Avenger vs Volvo XC90 comparison

Compare performance (156 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (22,500 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or Volvo XC90?

Jeep Avenger vs Volvo XC90: Key differences

Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more electric range
  • substantially lighter
details

Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Avenger

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Jeep Avenger is substantially cheaper – starting at 22,500 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 51,763 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC90 uses 3.4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Jeep Avenger offers substantially more range – reaching up to 400 km, about 331 km more than the Volvo XC90.

XC90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 250 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers clearly more torque with 669 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.

Avenger

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Jeep Avenger is substantially lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 900 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries noticeably more – 710 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 208 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Jeep Avenger holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,500
Avenger

Jeep Avenger

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 100 - 156 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 400 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Jeep Avenger and the Fiat Panda comes down to whether you prefer a compact, SUV‑styled EV with modern tech and a higher driving position or a no‑nonsense, city‑focused hatchback built for practicality and low running costs. The Avenger targets buyers wanting electric range and …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Compass
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Compass target different buyers: the Avenger is a small electric crossover focused on urban efficiency, while the Compass is a larger, more traditional compact SUV with broader engine and capability options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise …
Jeep Avenger
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Jeep Avenger

The Jeep Avenger mixes rugged styling with a compact, city‑friendly footprint that makes it easy to maneuver while keeping Jeep’s adventurous character. Inside it offers a practical, modern cabin with sensible tech and comfort aimed at everyday driving and light weekend getaways.

details
2118838-03507ed1v0(1)
2118850-pp58p0pybj
2118871-xg718qsa6s(1)
2118877-sxxt0lqr4b(1)
2118868-dnxb2h5cci

Reviews Jeep Avenger

4.1 (9 Reviews)
rate
Marco
21 May 2026, 15:07:20

Practical car, zippy especially in the city, equipped with excellent technology, handles bumps and rough surfaces very well, super satisfied.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mattia
5 May 2026, 13:45:25

The car itself is very nice and very comfortable; I've been using it for a year and a half now and I've never had mechanical or engine problems. Fuel consumption is very good for the class, considering it's almost an SUV and, in my case, a petrol-only car. It uses little fuel if you keep a relaxed pace; when you push it it obviously starts to drink more, but if used properly the consumption is optimal. The only flaw of this car is the electronics (ECU, displays, device updates): the car quite often has problems with the instrument cluster and the central display, which is very annoying given that electronics are now fundamental in cars, especially for city driving or short trips. Other than that no problems — I use the car mainly for work, and after a year and a half and 47,000 km I can say it's recommendable if the electronics issue doesn't bother you.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alejandro Montes
14 Apr 2026, 16:42:03

It's a tough decision, but definitely the Avenger — more technology and better fuel economy.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Angelo
1 Mar 2026, 09:36:45

The Jeep Avenger mild hybrid sports an attractive design. The engine and automatic gearbox are very smooth and capable. Driving is intuitive and pleasant with low urban fuel consumption and the ability to cover short low-speed stretches in electric-only mode despite being a mild hybrid.

Negatives: imperfect panel fit, software and graphical interface often unreliable and inconsistent, losing stored display settings. Narrow seat positioning and an interior with limited space relative to the car’s exterior dimensions. Condensation forming in the rear lights despite replacement under warranty.

Overall quality is modest and does not justify the price. Dashboard and door-panel plastics feel cheap and brittle. Overall quality is barely mediocre.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mauro
19 Feb 2026, 10:57:10

Jeep is no longer the reliable brand it once was, and the Avenger shows the effects of poor overall quality. Cute, but uncomfortable (narrow seats... you hurt your hand trying to buckle the seatbelt!)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC90

The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.

details
294665_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294657_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
294651_XC90_Recharge_T8_AWD_Denim_Blue
248324_XC90_Plug-In_Hybrid_Inscription_T8_-_Seat_Configuration
294870_XC90_Recharge_interior

Reviews Volvo XC90

5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Ffg
16 May 2026, 03:34:35

Ffggggggg ffg

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Borstel
11 Nov 2025, 12:59:12

I drive both cars. The XC90’s boot is — contrary to the figures posted here — noticeably larger than the GLC’s when carrying five people. Overall the XC90 is clearly the more comfortable and, above all, the more stable — and therefore the safer — car.

Frequently compared as well

Jeep Avenger
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara are two compact SUVs that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with some crossover capability — the Avenger emphasizes modern design and electrified options, while the Vitara leans on proven practicality and value. This short comparison …
Jeep Avenger
Jeep Renegade
VS
The Jeep Avenger and Jeep Renegade both wear the Jeep badge but aim at different buyers: the Avenger is a newer, city-focused compact (with an electric option in many markets), while the Renegade is a bigger, more rugged small SUV with broader engine choices. This comparison highlights the key …
Volvo XC90
MG MGS9
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the MG MGS9 are rival seven-seat SUVs aimed at buyers who want space, comfort and modern tech — but they come from very different traditions: Volvo leans on safety, refined materials and a premium driving feel, while MG focuses on affordability and generous equipment. This quick …
Jeep Avenger
Peugeot 2008
VS
Deciding between the Jeep Avenger and the Peugeot 2008 means choosing between two competent subcompact SUVs that balance city-friendly size with practical versatility. The Avenger leans into Jeep styling and a tougher image, especially with its electric option, while the 2008 emphasises refined …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC90
VS
The Peugeot 5008 and Volvo XC90 both offer three-row seating but aim at different buyers: the 5008 is a practical, value-focused family SUV while the XC90 is a premium, safety-led luxury SUV. This comparison will focus on space, comfort, performance, efficiency and running costs to help you decide …
Alfa Romeo Junior
Jeep Avenger
VS
Comparing the Alfa Romeo Junior and the Jeep Avenger pits a classic, driver-focused Italian coupe against a contemporary, city-sized crossover built for everyday practicality. If you value vintage charisma and engaging steering, the Junior is instantly appealing; if you prefer modern safety, …
Jeep Avenger
Volvo XC90

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,500 - 36,800 £
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
400 km
Electric Range
69 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 129 g/km
co2
71 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,180 - 1,520 kg
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,776 mm
Width
1,923 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
490 - 502 kg
Payload
600 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Jeep
Brand
Volvo
Is the Jeep Avenger offered with different drivetrains?

The Jeep Avenger is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.