Compare performance (225 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Compass or Mitsubishi ASX?
In a world where SUVs reign supreme, the Jeep Compass and the Mitsubishi ASX continue to carve out a niche by offering modern tech, solid performance, and versatility. With new 2024 models on the horizon, prospective buyers are presented with two compelling options. Let's dive into the comparisons based on technical specifications and innovations.
The Jeep Compass boasts robust dimensions, stretching 4404 mm in length, 1819 mm in width, and standing tall between 1629 and 1649 mm. Its commanding presence is marked with modern aesthetics that are sure to turn heads. In comparison, the Mitsubishi ASX is slightly more compact, measuring 4239 mm in length and 1797 mm in width, with a height of 1575 mm. While it may appear smaller, the ASX offers a design that is both sleek and functional, making it ideal for urban and suburban commutes.
Under the hood, the Jeep Compass delivers a diverse range of powertrains. Options include Petrol MHEV and Plugin Hybrid engines, producing power outputs ranging from 130 to 240 HP with acceleration spans from 10.3 to an impressive 7.3 seconds to reach 100km/h. This is paired with a choice between a dual-clutch automatic or traditional automatic gearbox, complemented by the versatility of front-wheel or all-wheel drive configurations.
In contrast, the Mitsubishi ASX offers engines in petrol, mild hybrid, and full hybrid variants, with power outputs ranging between 91 and 158 HP. The ASX reaches 100km/h in times varying from 14 to a brisk 8.5 seconds. While its engine lineup might seem less powerful, the focus on efficiency with a top consumption rate of 4.7 L/100km and a battery capacity of 0.6 kWh offers an environmentally conscious driving experience.
Both the Compass and the ASX sport abundant technological features. The Compass stands out with its potential for an all-wheel drive system, coupled with innovative hybrid technologies that extend its electric range to 36 km, emphasizing eco-friendly prowess without sacrificing too much on the power front.
The ASX, on the other hand, embraces simplicity with a breadth of functional technology that complements its petrol and hybrid engines. While it lacks the advanced hybrid range of the Compass, it compensates with a reputation for being a robust, dependable family car tailored for practical journeys.
Both SUVs offer a 5-seat configuration, but storage capacity offers a point of divergence. The Jeep Compass provides between 420 to 438 liters of trunk space, catering to those who balance work and adventure. Mitsubishi counters with its ASX, offering a trunk capacity of 348 to 484 liters, slightly extending the possibilities for daily use and longer road trips.
The Compass leans towards a slightly higher curb weight, ranging from 1575 to a robust 1935 kg, impacting its handling characteristics, especially when the vehicle is fully loaded. The ASX, lighter in comparison, ranges from 1296 to 1501 kg, providing a more agile handling experience.
Choosing between the Jeep Compass and Mitsubishi ASX boils down to personal preferences and priorities. If you favor power, off-road capabilities, and a sprinkle of electrified innovation, the Compass takes the lead. Meanwhile, if you're seeking a practical, efficient, and traditionally reliable SUV, the ASX presents an enticing option.
Ultimately, both offer unique strengths that cater to diverse lifestyles and needs, ensuring that no matter your choice, you're in for a ride that's sure to satisfy.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mitsubishi ASX is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Jeep Compass costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,780 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Jeep Compass uses 3 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Jeep Compass offers visibly more power – delivering 225 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 67 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jeep Compass is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jeep Compass delivers visibly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is markedly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,667 kg. The difference is around 371 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jeep Compass offers a bit more boot space – 550 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 66 L.
The Jeep Compass is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Compass packs classic Jeep styling with a surprisingly composed demeanor, equally at home turning heads in the city or tackling a weekend dirt track. Inside it's a pragmatic, user-friendly compact SUV that prioritizes comfort and versatility — a smart pick if you want a dose of adventure without giving up everyday sense.
details
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 43,200 £
|
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
95 - 500 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
74 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 130 g/km
|
co2
99 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,667 - 2,198 kg
|
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
550 L
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
|
Length
4,552 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
1,675 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,561 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
397 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
145 - 225 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 188 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
|
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
107 - 165 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,596 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España