Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Kia Stonic's engine?

Up to 115 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Kia Stonic use?

On average, the Kia Stonic consumes 5.60 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Kia Stonic offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 352 L fit inside.

What are the Kia Stonic’s length, width and height?

Overall, the Kia Stonic is 4165 mm long, 1760 mm wide and 1520 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Mitsubishi ASX's engine?

Up to 158 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Mitsubishi ASX use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.40 L.

How fast can the Mitsubishi ASX go?

The Mitsubishi ASX reaches up to 180 km/h.

How big is the Mitsubishi ASX overall?

The Mitsubishi ASX measures 4239 mm long, 1797 mm wide and 1575 mm high.

Kia Stonic vs Mitsubishi ASX - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia Stonic has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20100 £ , while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 20600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 428 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.60 L. The difference is about 1.20 L per 100 km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a distinct edge – offering 158 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.70 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Stonic performs minimal better – reaching 182 km/h, while the Mitsubishi ASX tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 2 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls noticeable stronger with 270 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Stonic is barely noticeable lighter – 1205 kg compared to 1296 kg. The difference is around 91 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers noticeable more room – 484 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 132 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs noticeable better – up to 1596 L, which is about 441 L more than the Kia Stonic.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi ASX slight takes the win – 449 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Reviews Kia Stonic

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Hyundai Bayon

Kia Stonic

VS

In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic each offer unique appeal with their distinctive designs and performance characteristics. While the Bayon impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the Stonic stands out for its sporty handling and …

Dacia Sandero

Kia Stonic

VS

In the competitive subcompact segment, the Dacia Sandero stands out with its impressive value for money, offering a spacious interior and practicality at an affordable price. Meanwhile, the Kia Stonic impresses with its stylish design and a more extensive tech suite, appealing to younger drivers …

Costs and Consumption
Price 20100 - 26600 £	Price 20600 - 32500 £
Consumption L/100km 5.6 - 5.9 L	Consumption L/100km 4.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 127 - 133 g/km	co2 99 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 45 L	Fuel tank capacity 48 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1205 - 1270 kg	Curb weight 1296 - 1493 kg
Trunk capacity 352 L	Trunk capacity 348 - 484 L
Length 4165 mm	Length 4239 mm
Width 1760 mm	Width 1797 mm
Height 1520 mm	Height 1575 mm
Max trunk capacity 1155 L	Max trunk capacity 1458 - 1596 L
Payload 440 - 445 kg	Payload 397 - 449 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 100 - 115 HP	Power HP 91 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.7 - 12.1 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.5 - 14 s
Max Speed 179 - 182 km/h	Max Speed 168 - 180 km/h
Torque 172 - 200 Nm	Torque 160 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders 3	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 74 - 85 kW	Power kW 67 - 116 kW
Engine capacity 998 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1789 cm3