Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Kia Niro vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (180 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 36800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Volvo XC40?
Niro
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Kia Niro has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7628 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 4.10 L per 100 km.
XC40
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 197 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs minimal better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls to a small extent stronger with 300 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Niro
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Kia Niro is somewhat lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers hardly perceptible more room – 452 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1445 L, which is about 117 L more than the Volvo XC40.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 somewhat takes the win – 532 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Kia Niro is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Kia Niro
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £29,100
Kia Niro
Kia Niro
5 (1 Reviews)
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
Volvo XC40
5 (4 Reviews)
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Kia Niro
Volvo XC40
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 38600 £
|
Price
36800 - 47200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
53 - 111 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
|
Curb weight
1688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4420 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1825 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1545 mm
|
Height
1652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?
The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.