@ Kia Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Kia Niro vs Volvo XC40 – Which one offers the better deal?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Kia Niro or Volvo XC40?

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Compact SUVs in Focus: Kia Niro vs. Volvo XC40

In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, two prominent models stand out: the Kia Niro and the Volvo XC40. These vehicles offer distinct approaches to the modern SUV experience, catering to different preferences and needs. With a focus on efficiency, power, and innovation, the 2024 models present a fascinating comparison for potential buyers. Let's explore the key technical aspects and innovations that set these two contenders apart.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Performance and Power

The Kia Niro, available as a Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid, offers power outputs of 129 HP and 171 HP respectively. With front-wheel drive and a dual-clutch automatic transmission, its performance is tuned for efficiency. The hybrid systems prioritize eco-friendliness, with consumption figures of just 4.4 L/100km for the Full Hybrid, and an impressive 0.8 L/100km for the Plugin Hybrid variant.

On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 offers gasoline-powered mild hybrid (MHEV) variants with outputs ranging from 163 HP to 197 HP. Equipped with front-wheel drive and a similar dual-clutch automatic transmission, the XC40 focuses on delivering a robust driving experience, achieving 0-100km/h in as little as 7.6 seconds. Its versatility is evident in its ability to consume 6.5 L/100km, providing a balance between power and fuel economy.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Hybrid Efficiency vs. Engine Capacity

The Kia Niro's hybrid nature shines through in its exceptional CO2 efficiency class ratings of C and B, with CO2 emissions as low as 19 g/km in the Plugin Hybrid. It presents an environmentally friendly option with an electric range of up to 65 km and a battery capacity of 11.1 kWh in the Plugin variant, offering significant savings in terms of running costs.

While the Volvo XC40 focuses on refined power with its 1969 cm3 engine yielding CO2 emissions of around 147 g/km, its efficiency class falls under category E. The SUV compensates with its larger fuel tank capacity and torque figures maxing out at 300 Nm, ensuring a dynamic ride.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Dimensions and Practicality

When it comes to dimensions, the Kia Niro measures 4420 mm in length and 1825 mm in width, with a trunk capacity of 451 liters for the Full Hybrid model—ideal for urban maneuverability and weekend getaways. Its curb weight varies between 1474 kg and 1594 kg, contributing to its nimble handling characteristics.

Conversely, the Volvo XC40, slightly longer at 4425 mm and wider at 1863 mm, offers a comparable trunk capacity of 452 liters. With a curb weight of 1688 kg, it provides a more substantial feel on the road, suitable for drivers seeking an SUV with a commanding presence.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Technological Innovations and Features

The Kia Niro integrates advanced hybrid technology, emphasizing electric driving options and reduced emissions. Its suite of features includes smart cruise control and navigation-based adaptive functionality, optimizing both highway efficiency and city commute.

The Volvo XC40, renowned for its safety and infotainment systems, includes intuitive tech like pilot assist and a cutting-edge Sensus infotainment system. The SUV also focuses on luxury with its high-quality interior and advanced driver-assistance technologies, appealing to those looking for a premium experience combined with innovative safety.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion: Choosing Your Compact Companion

In essence, both the Kia Niro and Volvo XC40 cater to different segments of the compact SUV market. The Niro stands out for those who prioritize hybrid efficiency, low emissions, and cost-effectiveness. Meanwhile, the XC40 appeals to drivers seeking power, luxury, and innovative safety features. Each SUV offers a unique blend of attributes, making them worthy contenders for anyone in the market for a versatile compact SUV in 2024.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Niro has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 7628 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Kia Niro manages with 2.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 4.10 L per 100 km.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 197 HP compared to 180 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Kia Niro takes 9.90 s. That’s about 2.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Kia Niro performs minimal better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls to a small extent stronger with 300 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

Niro @ Kia Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Niro is somewhat lighter – 1474 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers hardly perceptible more room – 452 L compared to 451 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Kia Niro performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1445 L, which is about 117 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 somewhat takes the win – 532 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Kia Niro shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £29,100
Niro @ Kia Corporation

Kia Niro

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 138 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.4 - 4.9 L
  • Electric Range : 57 - 62 km
details

Kia Niro

5 (1)
rate

The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.

details
Kia_Niro_HEV_08 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Niro_HEV_24 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Niro_HEV_22 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Niro_HEV_05 @ Kia Corporation
Kia_Niro_HEV_13 @ Kia Corporation

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Kia Niro
Volvo XC40
Niro @ Kia Corporation
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
29100 - 38600 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 4.9 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
57 - 62 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
1.3 - 11.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
53 - 111 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
37 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1474 - 1594 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 451 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4420 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1825 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1545 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1342 - 1445 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
466 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
138 - 180 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 11.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
265 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
102 - 132 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1580 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Kia
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Stonic
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro and Kia Stonic each bring their own unique strengths to the table. The Niro impresses with its hybrid efficiency and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Stonic stands out with its sporty design and …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Kia Corporation
Kia XCeed
VS
In the battle of practicality and style, the Kia Niro and Kia XCeed stand out with their unique offerings. The Niro excels in fuel efficiency and eco-friendly technology, appealing to the environmentally conscious driver, while the XCeed boasts a sportier design and elevated driving position for …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Formentor
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the battle of sportiness and practicality, the CUPRA Formentor and Volvo XC40 present compelling choices for discerning drivers. The Formentor's dynamic styling and performance-oriented features exude a sense of excitement, while the XC40 offers a more refined and spacious interior paired with a …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Niro
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR present compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers seeking a stylish and efficient crossover. The Niro, with its hybrid and electric options, emphasizes fuel economy and a spacious interior, making it ideal for families or those with cargo needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR …
Is the Kia Niro offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Niro is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.