VS

Kia Stonic vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (115 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (20,100 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Kia Stonic vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more power
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • substantially cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • markedly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Kia Stonic costs 20,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,486 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia Stonic offers visibly more power – delivering 115 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia Stonic is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 10.7 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Kia Stonic is barely faster – reaching 182 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia Stonic delivers substantially more torque with 200 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 98 Nm more.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is markedly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,205 kg. The difference is around 265 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia Stonic offers visibly more boot space – 352 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Kia Stonic offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,155 L, about 243 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, the Kia Stonic carries slightly more – 445 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Kia Stonic is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,100
Stonic

Kia Stonic

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 100 - 115 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.6 - 5.9 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Sportage
Kia Stonic
VS
Kia Sportage and Kia Stonic go head-to-head in a battle of size and sense — one’s a roomy family SUV that eats motorways for breakfast, the other a scrappy city companion that squeezes into parking gaps like it’s a sport. If you need space, comfort and a bit of presence, pick the Sportage; if you …
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
Kia Stonic
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.

details
Kia_Stonic_MY22_04
Kia_Stonic_MY22_16
Kia_Stonic_MY22_15
Kia_Stonic_MY22_08
Kia_Stonic_MJ22_05

Reviews Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jan
18 Mar 2026, 07:19:10

Very good car, uses little fuel, nothing's gone wrong in 4 years, no breakdowns.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ennio
4 Feb 2026, 13:19:36

I'm very satisfied — I have a Stonic Black Edition hybrid, and I haven't had any problems after two years.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Kia Niro
Kia Stonic
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Kia Niro and Kia Stonic each bring their own unique strengths to the table. The Niro impresses with its hybrid efficiency and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for eco-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Stonic stands out with its sporty design and …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic stands out with its bold design and vibrant color options, appealing to younger, style-conscious buyers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kamiq impresses with its spacious interior and practical features, making it a strong choice for families looking …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Dacia Sandero stands out with its impressive value for money, offering a spacious interior and practicality at an affordable price. Meanwhile, the Kia Stonic impresses with its stylish design and a more extensive tech suite, appealing to younger drivers …
Kia Ceed
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive compact segment, the Kia Ceed and Kia Stonic each offer unique advantages tailored to different lifestyles. The Ceed impresses with its spacious interior and refined ride quality, making it a strong choice for families or those who prioritize comfort on longer journeys. In …
Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
When comparing the Kia Picanto and the Kia Stonic, both models showcase the brand's commitment to stylish design and impressive efficiency. The Picanto stands out with its compact size, making it perfect for urban driving, while the Stonic offers a more rugged look and additional cargo space, …
Kia Stonic
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Kia Stonic and Toyota Yaris Cross both bring unique strengths to the table. The Stonic impresses with its sporty design and customizable features, making it ideal for younger buyers seeking style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross stands out with its …
Hyundai Kona
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona and Kia Stonic continue to impress with their blend of style, practicality, and technology. While the Kona offers a more dynamic driving experience and a slightly more upscale interior, the Stonic stands out with its customizable options …
Kia Stonic
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,100 - 26,600 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
127 - 133 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
352 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
4,165 mm
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
1,520 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
440 - 445 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
179 - 182 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Kia
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.