VS

Kia Stonic vs SsangYong Torres comparison

Compare performance (115 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (20,400 £ vs 33,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Stonic or SsangYong Torres?

Kia Stonic vs SsangYong Torres: Key differences

Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly lighter
details

SsangYong Torres

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Kia Stonic is considerably cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the SsangYong Torres costs 33,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,457 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia Stonic uses 5.6 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the SsangYong Torres with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

Torres

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Torres offers clearly more power – delivering 207 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 92 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Torres delivers considerably more torque with 339 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 139 Nm more.

Stonic

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is markedly lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 293 kg.

Looking at boot space, the SsangYong Torres offers considerably more boot space – 703 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 351 L.

When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Torres carries moderately more – 552 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The SsangYong Torres is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,800
Torres

SsangYong Torres

  • Engine Type Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 163 - 207 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 462 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Picanto and Kia Stonic are closely related but aimed at different needs: the Picanto is a pint-sized city hatch built for nimble urban driving and low running costs, while the Stonic is a small crossover that adds higher seating, extra boot space and a more rugged presence. This comparison …
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted …
Kia Stonic
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that pairs nimble city manners with a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin. It’s a practical, well-equipped choice for buyers who value sensible features, approachable styling and easy everyday usability.

details
Kia_Stonic_MY22_04
Kia_Stonic_MY22_16
Kia_Stonic_MY22_15
Kia_Stonic_MY22_08
Kia_Stonic_MJ22_05

Reviews Kia Stonic

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jan
18 Mar 2026, 07:19:10

Very good car, uses little fuel, nothing's gone wrong in 4 years, no breakdowns.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ennio
4 Feb 2026, 13:19:36

I'm very satisfied — I have a Stonic Black Edition hybrid, and I haven't had any problems after two years.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

SsangYong Torres

SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.

details
serpimg_HNB7qw

Reviews SsangYong Torres

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Nelson GAlindo Arias
12 May 2026, 21:17:14

It's a comfortable car with good performance and economical.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i20
Kia Stonic
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Kia Stonic comes down to whether you value the i20’s refined hatchback driving dynamics and efficient packaging or the Stonic’s higher ride height, SUV-like presence and slightly more practical load space. I’ll compare their engines, interior space, …
Kia Niro
Kia Stonic
VS
The Kia Niro and Kia Stonic step into the compact crossover ring with very different tricks up their sleeves — the Niro is the sensible, efficiency-first all-rounder, while the Stonic is the cheeky, city-savvy funster with a pocket-sized personality. Which one suits your life — long motorway miles …
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Dacia Sandero
Kia Stonic
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Kia Stonic target buyers who want compact practicality, but they take very different approaches — Sandero focuses on low cost and straightforward utility while the Stonic offers more style, features and refinement. This quick comparison highlights where each model shines so …
Kia Ceed
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive compact segment, the Kia Ceed and Kia Stonic each offer unique advantages tailored to different lifestyles. The Ceed impresses with its spacious interior and refined ride quality, making it a strong choice for families or those who prioritize comfort on longer journeys. In …
Kia Sportage
Kia Stonic
VS
Kia Sportage and Kia Stonic go head-to-head in a battle of size and sense — one’s a roomy family SUV that eats motorways for breakfast, the other a scrappy city companion that squeezes into parking gaps like it’s a sport. If you need space, comfort and a bit of presence, pick the Sportage; if you …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Choosing between the Kia Stonic and the Skoda Kamiq comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and stylish looks or interior space and everyday practicality. The Stonic offers eye-catching design and a peppy, value-oriented drive, while the Kamiq delivers superior cabin quality, …
Kia Stonic
Opel Corsa
VS
Kia Stonic and Opel Corsa go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Stonic or the Opel Corsa …
Kia Stonic
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
462 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 128 g/km
co2
0 - 207 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
Trunk capacity
352 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
4,700 mm
Width
1,760 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
1,710 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
Payload
440 - 445 kg
Payload
552 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Kia
Brand
SsangYong
Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.