VS

Kia Stonic vs VW T-Roc – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Kia Stonic meets VW T-Roc.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Stonic @ press.kia.com

The Compact Rivalry: Kia Stonic vs. VW T-Roc

In an ever-evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs steal the spotlight with their versatility and style. Two formidable contenders in this category are the Kia Stonic and the VW T-Roc. Boasting innovative features and distinct characteristics, these models cater to diverse needs. Let's dive into the technical details and innovations that set them apart.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Design and Dimensions

The Kia Stonic and VW T-Roc, both classified as compact SUVs, bring their unique flair to the table. The Stonic, with its length of 4140 mm, width of 1760 mm, and height of 1505 mm, showcases a sleek, urban-friendly design. Meanwhile, the T-Roc is slightly larger, offering lengths varying from 4236 mm to 4271 mm, width from 1811 mm to 1819 mm, and height ranging from 1527 mm to 1584 mm. This extra space translates into more interior room for occupants and luggage, emphasizing practicality for larger loads or adventurous trips.

Stonic @ press.kia.com

Powertrains and Performance

The Kia Stonic offers a range of petrol and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) engines, delivering power outputs between 79 HP and 100 HP. It comes with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, both operating on front-wheel drive. The Stonic provides a balance between efficiency and spirited driving with an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 to 14.2 seconds, and a top speed of up to 179 km/h.

In contrast, the VW T-Roc presents a wider selection of engines, including both petrol and diesel options. Boasting power outputs from 115 HP to a sporty 300 HP, the T-Roc caters to varied preferences. It's available with manual, dual-clutch automatic transmissions, and both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. The T-Roc achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, especially with the higher output models, making it a thrill for those who value performance.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Efficiency and Emissions

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Kia Stonic shows a range from 5.5 to 5.8 L/100km, emitting between 125 to 132 g/km of CO2, making it a sensible choice for the eco-conscious. It is classified under CO2 efficiency class D.

The VW T-Roc, with its broader range of engines, offers fuel consumption figures between 4.7 to 8.5 L/100km and CO2 emissions from 125 to 194 g/km. This efficiency range matches its diverse powertrain options and is classified from D to G in CO2 efficiency classes, giving buyers more flexibility in balancing performance and economy.

Stonic @ press.kia.com

Interior Comfort and Cargo Space

Designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, the Kia Stonic provides a tranquil ride with its well-appointed cabin. It features a trunk capacity of 352 liters, sufficient for weekend getaways or daily commutes.

The VW T-Roc amplifies interior space with trunk capacities ranging from 284 to 445 liters, depending on the chosen model. This allows for versatile cargo solutions, whether it's everyday errands or long road trips, supported by its slightly larger payload capacity, ranging from 368 to 509 kg.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Conclusion: Choosing the Right SUV

Whether prioritizing style, performance, or practicality, both the Kia Stonic and the VW T-Roc offer compelling propositions in the compact SUV segment. The Stonic appeals with its urban-friendly dimensions and efficient operation, while the T-Roc stands out with its larger body, varied engine options, and robust performance capabilities. The decision ultimately depends on individual driving preferences and lifestyle needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Stonic @ press.kia.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Kia Stonic has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 19400 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 6990 £.

Both cars consume an average of 5.50 L per 100 km – no difference here.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc has a distinct edge – offering 150 HP compared to 100 HP. That’s roughly 50 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 11.30 s. That’s about 2.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs a bit better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Kia Stonic tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 33 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls to a small extent stronger with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

Stonic @ press.kia.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Kia Stonic is clearly perceptible lighter – 1195 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 270 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers clearly perceptible more room – 475 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 123 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs somewhat better – up to 1350 L, which is about 195 L more than the Kia Stonic.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc slightly takes the win – 515 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 60 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW T-Roc shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £26,400
DB2022AU00087_medium

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.3 L
details

Kia Stonic

The Kia Stonic is a compact crossover that seamlessly blends bold design with practical functionality. Its distinctive, eye-catching exterior is complemented by a well-crafted interior offering a comfortable ride and intuitive technology for today's drivers. The Stonic is perfect for urban environments, providing agility and efficiency without compromising on style or performance.

details
Kia_Stonic_MY22_04 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Stonic_MY22_16 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Stonic_MY22_15 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Stonic_MY22_08 @ press.kia.com
Kia_Stonic_MJ22_05 @ press.kia.com

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc seamlessly blends stylish design with practical functionality, making it an ideal choice for those who enjoy both urban and countryside driving. Its modern interior features intuitive technology and comfortable seating, enhancing the overall driving experience. With its robust build and dynamic performance, the T-Roc is equipped to handle various road conditions with confidence.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a roomier boot, so choose the Golf for sharper handling and economy or the T‑Roc if you want presence, flexibility and the delightful illusion of being an inch taller.
Kia Stonic
Kia XCeed
VS
In the city crossover showdown, the Kia Stonic is the cheeky, budget-friendly pocket SUV while the Kia XCeed steps up as the sleeker, more grown-up option with sharper handling and extra space. Pick the Stonic for low running costs and easy parking; go for the XCeed if you want a more planted drive, better refinement and room for weekend gear — at a slightly higher price.
Kia Stonic
VW T-Roc
Stonic
T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
19400 - 25600 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 5.7 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
125 - 129 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1195 - 1260 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
352 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4140 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1760 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1505 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1155 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
450 - 455 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
100 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 12.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
176 - 179 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
74 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Kia
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling and sensible practicality combine to make it the smarter pick if you want SUV looks and fun without paying for the badge.
Kia Niro
VW T-Roc
VS
Kia Niro plays the sensible card with roomy packaging, excellent hybrid economy and impressively low running costs, while the VW T‑Roc is the flashier, more dynamic compact SUV that delivers sharper handling and a slightly more premium cabin. If you’re after thrift and family practicality go Niro; if you want style, a bit of fun and a nicer interior, the T‑Roc is the one to tempt you.
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its stylish Scandinavian design and commitment to safety, offering a serene driving experience complemented by a high-quality interior. On the other hand, the VW T-Roc impresses with its sportier dynamics and customizable features, appealing to drivers who prioritize a more engaging ride. Ultimately, the choice between the XC40 and T-Roc boils down to personal preferences in style, comfort, and driving experience.
Kia Ceed
Kia Stonic
VS
In the competitive compact segment, the Kia Ceed and Kia Stonic each offer unique advantages tailored to different lifestyles. The Ceed impresses with its spacious interior and refined ride quality, making it a strong choice for families or those who prioritize comfort on longer journeys. In contrast, the Stonic delivers a sportier, more agile driving experience, appealing to urban dwellers seeking style and maneuverability in a compact SUV.
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Skoda Kamiq holds its ground against the VW T-Roc by offering excellent value for money without sacrificing essential features. While the T-Roc boasts a more premium interior and sportier styling, the Kamiq impresses with its practicality and spacious cabin, making it a favorite among families. Ultimately, choosing between these two contenders will hinge on whether drivers prioritize style or functionality in their everyday rides.
Vauxhall Frontera
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Opel Frontera stands as a solid, robust option with a storied history of off-road capability, making it appealing to adventure seekers. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a more modern aesthetic with a focus on stylish urban driving, advanced safety features, and tech-savvy interior appointments. When choosing between the two, potential buyers will weigh the Frontera's rugged legacy against the T-Roc's contemporary flair and agility.
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to those who value versatility. Ultimately, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making the choice between them largely dependent on personal preference and lifestyle needs.
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive segment of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique styling and diverse feature sets. While the Qashqai is celebrated for its spacious interior and user-friendly technology, the T-Roc appeals to those seeking a sportier performance and premium interior options. Ultimately, choosing between these two best-sellers will depend on whether practicality or a dynamic driving experience takes precedence for the buyer.
Is the Kia Stonic offered with different drivetrains?

The Kia Stonic is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.