VS

Lucid Air vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (1,251 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (72,900 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Lucid Air or Renault Clio?

Lucid Air vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Lucid Air

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Air

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Clio is significantly cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Lucid Air costs 72,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 55,800 £.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lucid Air offers substantially more power – delivering 1,251 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 1,093 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lucid Air is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 2 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 6.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lucid Air delivers considerably more torque with 1,940 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 1,750 Nm more.

Air

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is substantially lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 868 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lucid Air offers substantially more boot space – 627 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 300 L.

When it comes to payload, the Lucid Air carries markedly more – 588 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lucid Air is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,900
Air

Lucid Air

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 442 - 1,251 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 694 - 882 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Fiat Panda
Renault Clio
VS
The Fiat Panda and Renault Clio are popular small cars that take very different approaches: the Panda focuses on practicality, rugged simplicity and roomy packaging for its size, while the Clio offers sharper styling, more refined driving and a tech-forward cabin. If you want easy ownership and …
Lucid Air
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Lucid Air

The Lucid Air feels like a hand-built electric limousine from the future, wrapping whisper-quiet performance and luxury in a sleek, aerodynamic shell. For buyers who want cutting-edge tech, sumptuous comfort and a quietly confident status symbol, it’s a compelling choice that makes EV ownership feel genuinely premium without shouting about it.

details
09-Pure_3q_front
08-pure-front-view
12-pure_side_profile
05-pure-cockpit-driver-side_ui

Reviews Lucid Air

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Pascal Michel
2 Jun 2026, 05:52:39

As accomplished, better underlying electrical drivetrain and 400k cheaper

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio is a smartly styled and practical compact hatch that feels at home in city traffic while offering a surprisingly refined ride. It pairs user-friendly tech and a comfortable interior with a reputation for being economical and easy to live with.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 208
Renault Clio
VS
In the dynamic world of compact hatchbacks, the Peugeot 208 and Renault Clio continue to capture the attention of drivers looking for style and efficiency. The Peugeot 208 stands out with its modern design and advanced connectivity features, offering a slightly sportier appeal. In contrast, the …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
The Ford Puma and Renault Clio are two popular compact choices that blend city-friendly dimensions with striking style, yet they adopt different priorities in driving character and practicality. The Puma leans toward a higher-riding, crossover feel with clever boot and storage solutions, while the …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Comparing the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza means choosing between two of Europe's most capable superminis: the Clio leans stylish and comfortable, while the Ibiza focuses on sharp handling and value. This quick head-to-head will highlight differences in driving feel, space, efficiency and …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Clio
VS
In the highly competitive subcompact segment, the Dacia Sandero and Renault Clio present distinct offerings tailored to budget-conscious buyers. While the Sandero boasts an impressive value proposition with its spacious interior and practicality, the Clio shines with its refined styling and …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai i20 and the Renault Clio means weighing practical space and proven reliability against a more stylish, comfort-focused hatch. I'll compare their driving dynamics, interior quality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your everyday life.
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Renault Clio and the Skoda Fabia are two of Europe's most sensible superminis, each offering a different balance of style, practicality and running costs. This comparison will help you decide whether the Clio’s polished drive and chic design or the Fabia’s roomier interior and everyday …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the small hatchback showdown, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek design and efficient engine, making it ideal for urban driving. On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a more rugged appeal with its crossover build, and enhanced driveability with its higher ride height and …
Lucid Air
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
72,900 - 214,300 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
694 - 882 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
92 - 118 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,420 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
627 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,975 - 5,005 mm
Length
-
Width
1,936 - 1,990 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,409 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 588 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
442 - 1,251 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2 - 4.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
200 - 330 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
550 - 1,940 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
325 - 920 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Lucid
Brand
Renault
Is the Lucid Air offered with different drivetrains?

The Lucid Air is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.