@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

Mazda 2 vs VW T-Roc - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (115 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (14200 £ vs 26400 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 or VW T-Roc?

Mazda 2

VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda 2 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 14200 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 12218 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda 2 manages with 4.70 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc has a noticeable edge – offering 150 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Mazda 2 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs minimal better – reaching 212 km/h, while the Mazda 2 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 12 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls noticeable stronger with 250 Nm compared to 151 Nm. That’s about 99 Nm difference.

2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda 2 is noticeable lighter – 1099 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 366 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers significantly more room – 475 L compared to 280 L. That’s a difference of about 195 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Roc performs noticeable better – up to 1350 L, which is about 400 L more than the Mazda 2.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc somewhat takes the win – 515 kg compared to 437 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the VW T-Roc shows itself to be slightly ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £26,400
T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.3 L
details
Mazda 2
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 2

The Mazda 2 is a pocket-sized charmer that makes city driving feel light and lively, wrapped in sleek styling that looks right at home on trendy streets. Buyers who want an economical, fun-to-drive hatch with surprisingly grown-up cabin quality will find it hard to resist — it’s the kind of everyday companion that puts a grin on your face every time you head out.

details
2022_mazda2_barcelona_act_04_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda2_barcelona_act_14_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda2_barcelona_still_21_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda2_barcelona_int_01_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda2_barcelona_int_27_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2022AU00087_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00088_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00086_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
DB2022AU00095_medium @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Reviews Mazda 2

Reviews VW T-Roc

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kamiq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Mazda 2
VW T-Roc
2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
14200 - 21700 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
107 - 122 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1099 - 1120 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
280 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4080 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1695 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1515 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
950 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
420 - 437 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
75 - 115 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 12.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
171 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
143 - 151 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
55 - 85 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1496 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
@ Audi AG
Audi Q3
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Ateca
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the VW T-Roc both bring distinct flavors to the table. The Mazda CX-30 is celebrated for its elegant design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a luxurious feel with its high-quality interior and impressive handling. Meanwhile, the …
@ SEAT S.A. / SEAT Media Center
SEAT Arona
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
Unsure whether the SEAT Arona or the VW T-Roc is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Is the Mazda 2 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda 2 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.