@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Renault Clio – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda 3 Hatchback meets Renault Clio.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16600 £, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 24500 £. That’s a price difference of around 7963 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.60 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.

Clio @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 28 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Hatchback is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Hatchback performs to a small extent better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Renault Clio tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda 3 Hatchback pulls slightly stronger with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Renault Clio is noticeable lighter – 1124 kg compared to 1419 kg. The difference is around 295 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Clio offers somewhat more room – 391 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 40 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio performs a bit better – up to 1176 L, which is about 150 L more than the Mazda 3 Hatchback.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Hatchback minimal takes the win – 485 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Renault Clio shows itself to be wins solidly and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £16,600
Clio @ Renault Group Media

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 67 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.3 L
details

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 Hatchback presents a sleek and modern design, capturing attention with its streamlined curves and dynamic stance. Inside, the interior showcases high-quality materials and an intuitive layout, providing comfort and ease for both driver and passengers. On the road, this hatchback impresses with its agile handling and responsive performance, making it a practical yet stylish choice for urban and suburban driving.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p @ Renault Group Media
r212188p @ Renault Group Media
r212211p @ Renault Group Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Citroën / Stellantis Media
Citroen C3
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior …
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG3
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Renault Clio
3 Hatchback @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Clio @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
24500 - 35500 £
Price
16600 - 23700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
92 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1419 - 1549 kg
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
4460 mm
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
Height
1435 mm
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity
1022 - 1026 L
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
Payload
470 - 485 kg
Payload
398 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
Max Speed
199 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2023 - 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i10
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its impressive maneuverability and surprising interior space, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio captivates with its stylish design and advanced technology features, offering a more …
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Sandero
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the highly competitive subcompact segment, the Dacia Sandero and Renault Clio present distinct offerings tailored to budget-conscious buyers. While the Sandero boasts an impressive value proposition with its spacious interior and practicality, the Clio shines with its refined styling and …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai i20
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive segment of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Renault Clio stand out with distinctive attributes. The Hyundai i20 impresses with its tech-laden interior and efficient performance, making it a practical choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers a blend …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Captur
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the ever-popular Renault Captur versus Renault Clio showdown, drivers can expect distinct advantages in both compact versatility and sporty handling. The Captur shines with its higher driving position and spacious interior, making it ideal for urban adventures and family outings. Meanwhile, the …
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
Honda Jazz
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Honda Jazz and Renault Clio stand out with their unique offerings. The Jazz impresses with its practicality and flexible interior space, making it a perfect choice for urban dwellers. Meanwhile, the Clio captivates with its stylish design and engaging …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda 2 Hybrid
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda 3 Hatchback
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda 2 Hybrid or the Mazda 3 Hatchback is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Clio
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
Renault Clio and Renault R5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Hatchback have?

The Mazda 3 Hatchback is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.