What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda 3 Sedan?

Depending on the version, the Mazda 3 Sedan delivers up to 186 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda 3 Sedan in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.50 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Mazda 3 Sedan offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 450 L fit inside.

What are the Mazda 3 Sedan’s length, width and height?

The Mazda 3 Sedan measures 4660 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1440 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Renault Arkana have?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Renault Arkana?

Up to 143 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Renault Arkana use?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 4.70 L.

How many kWh does the Renault Arkana’s battery hold?

The battery offers a capacity of 0.60 kWh.

What are the Renault Arkana’s length, width and height?

Length 4568 mm, width 1821 mm, height 1576 mm – those are the dimensions of the Renault Arkana.

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Renault Arkana – Which car is better? Specs, differences & prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda 3 Sedan has a to a small extent advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25000 £, while the Renault Arkana costs 28500 £. That’s a price difference of around 3480 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a distinct edge – offering 186 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Sedan performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 44 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda 3 Sedan pulls to a small extent stronger with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm difference.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is hardly perceptible lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Arkana offers hardly perceptible more room – 480 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Sedan minimal takes the win – 481 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda 3 Sedan proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda 3 Sedan is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Renault Group Media

Renault Arkana

@ Renault Group Media

Renault Symbioz

VS

The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …

@ Renault Group Media

Renault Arkana

@ Renault Group Media

Renault Austral

VS

In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …

Costs and Consumption
Price 25000 - 34200 £	Price 28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.1 L	Consumption L/100km 4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 0.60 kWh
co2 123 - 135 g/km	co2 106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Sedan	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 4	Doors 5
Curb weight 1420 - 1492 kg	Curb weight 1510 kg
Trunk capacity 450 L	Trunk capacity 480 L
Length 4660 mm	Length 4568 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1821 mm
Height 1440 mm	Height 1576 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1263 L
Payload 467 - 481 kg	Payload 451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Full Hybrid
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 10.80 s
Max Speed 203 - 216 km/h	Max Speed 172 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 105 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1598 cm3