What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda 3 Sedan?

Depending on the version, the Mazda 3 Sedan delivers up to 186 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda 3 Sedan in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.50 L.

How many liters of cargo space does the Mazda 3 Sedan offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 450 L fit inside.

What are the Mazda 3 Sedan’s length, width and height?

The Mazda 3 Sedan measures 4660 mm long, 1795 mm wide and 1440 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kamiq?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the Skoda Kamiq deliver on the road?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kamiq according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5.30 L.

What maximum speed does the Skoda Kamiq reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 216 km/h.

What are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq?

Length 4241 mm, width 1793 mm, height 1562 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kamiq.

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Skoda Kamiq - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kamiq has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25000 £. That’s a price difference of around 3266 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kamiq manages with 5.30 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a to a small extent edge – offering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the is quicker – completing the sprint in , while the takes . That’s about faster.

In terms of top speed, the performs better – reaching , while the tops out at . The difference is around .

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kamiq pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

Kamiq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is to a small extent lighter – 1231 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 189 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers a bit more room – 450 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kamiq a bit takes the win – 539 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda 3 Sedan shows itself to be offers a more balanced package and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Skoda Kamiq

5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW T-Roc

VS

Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kamiq

@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

VW Taigo

VS

In the compact crossover ring the Skoda Kamiq plays the sensible everyman—generous boot, clever storage and frugal engines—while the VW Taigo strikes a pose with coupe‑like styling and a slightly livelier, more characterful drive. If you need practical space and everyday value, pick the Kamiq; if …

Costs and Consumption
Price 25000 - 34200 £	Price 21700 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.1 L	Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 123 - 135 g/km	co2 121 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 51 L	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Sedan	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 4	Doors 5
Curb weight 1420 - 1492 kg	Curb weight 1231 - 1340 kg
Trunk capacity 450 L	Trunk capacity 400 L
Length 4660 mm	Length 4241 mm
Width 1795 mm	Width 1793 mm
Height 1440 mm	Height 1562 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1395 L
Payload 467 - 481 kg	Payload 439 - 539 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol MHEV	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 140 - 186 HP	Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 9.8 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 11 s
Max Speed 203 - 216 km/h	Max Speed 183 - 216 km/h
Torque 238 - 240 Nm	Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 103 - 137 kW	Power kW 70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3