VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Skoda Kodiaq – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda 3 Sedan meets Skoda Kodiaq.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 3 Sedan has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25000 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 11871 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 5.10 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a evident edge – offering 265 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 79 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.10 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Mazda 3 Sedan tops out at 216 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls distinct stronger with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is a bit lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 264 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more room – 910 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 460 L.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq slightly takes the win – 545 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 64 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands out with its elegant and sleek design, capturing attention on the road with its refined aesthetics. Inside, it offers a well-crafted and comfortable cabin, providing a pleasurable driving experience marked by quality materials and advanced features. The car's performance is reliable and smooth, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and long-distance journeys.

details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Škoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and sleek design, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. Equipped with a range of modern features, it offers a comfortable driving experience and outstanding versatility. Its robust build and refined handling make it suitable for both urban settings and countryside escapades.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_45646 @ skoda-media.de
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Bigster
VS
In the competitive SUV landscape, the Skoda Kodiaq and Dacia Bigster offer distinct advantages for buyers seeking practicality and value. The Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and advanced technology, making it a top choice for families. In contrast, the Bigster appeals to budget-conscious consumers with its robust design and functionality, proving that affordability doesn't have to compromise style or capability.
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLB and Skoda Kodiaq stand out for their unique blend of luxury and practicality. While the GLB boasts a premium interior and advanced technology features, the Kodiaq excels in space and functionality, making it a family-friendly choice. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preferences, whether it's the opulence of the GLB or the value and versatility of the Kodiaq.
Mazda 3 Sedan
Skoda Kodiaq
Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
25000 - 34200 £
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1492 kg
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1864 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
460 - 545 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
203 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive SUV segment, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its spacious interior and family-friendly features, making it a top choice for those prioritizing comfort and practicality. On the other hand, the VW Tayron impresses with its stylish design and refined driving dynamics, appealing to those seeking a more premium experience. While both models share a common platform, their distinct personalities cater to different driver preferences, making this comparison essential for prospective buyers.
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty design and performance-focused features, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a thrilling driving experience. In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a more practical approach, emphasizing spaciousness and versatility without compromising on comfort. While the Terramar exudes a dynamic flair, the Kodiaq remains a solid choice for families needing a reliable and accommodating vehicle.
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the realm of family-friendly SUVs, the all-electric Skoda Enyaq and the traditional combustion engine-powered Skoda Kodiaq offer distinct experiences to prospective buyers. The Enyaq impresses with its futuristic design and seamless electric driving, providing an environmentally friendly alternative that excels in efficiency and innovation. Meanwhile, the Kodiaq stands as a versatile choice with a robust engine lineup and spacious interior, delivering a reliable performance that caters to those who prioritize long-distance capability and a classic SUV feel.
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Honda CR-V and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their blend of practicality and style. The CR-V impresses with its reliability and spacious interior, making it a family favorite, while the Kodiaq offers a touch of European flair and a versatile seven-seat option. Both vehicles deliver excellent performance and advanced safety features, making the choice largely dependent on personal preference and brand loyalty.
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Skoda Kodiaq and the VW Touran, both models showcase exceptional versatility but cater to slightly different audiences. The Kodiaq, with its bold SUV design and spacious three-row seating, is perfect for families and adventure seekers, while the Touran offers a more compact multi-purpose vehicle experience, ideal for urban dwellers. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on individual preferences for space, style, and driving experience.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of mid-size SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its impressive space and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families and those needing extra cargo capacity. On the other hand, the Volvo XC60 boasts a luxurious interior and advanced safety features that focus on a premium driving experience. Ultimately, the decision between these two models will hinge on whether buyers prioritize functionality or sophisticated comfort.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo XC90 exudes Scandinavian luxury, offering cutting-edge safety features, premium interior materials, and a more refined driving experience, albeit at a higher price point.
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing to families who prioritize comfort and adaptability. Both models offer distinct strengths, making the choice between them a matter of individual lifestyle needs and preferences.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.