VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs VW ID.3 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 231 HP), boot space and price (25,400 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or VW ID.3?

Mazda 3 Sedan vs VW ID.3: Key differences

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
details

VW ID.3

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Sedan is slightly cheaper – starting at 25,400 £ , while the VW ID.3 costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,690 £.

ID.3

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 offers somewhat more power – delivering 231 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.1 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.3 delivers clearly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is markedly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,885 kg. The difference is around 468 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers slightly more boot space – 450 L compared to 383 L. That’s a difference of about 67 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries barely more – 501 kg compared to 464 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW ID.3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £29,100
ID.3

VW ID.3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 170 - 231 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.9 - 14.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 410 - 629 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
Choosing between the retro-inspired Renault 5 and the practical VW ID.3 comes down to whether you value character and compact city agility or proven electric range and grown-up practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each car shines and which one fits different kinds …
VW ID.3
VW ID.4
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the VW ID.4 means deciding between a compact hatchback-style electric built for city driving and a roomier compact SUV that prioritizes cargo space and versatility. I’ll compare range, practicality, driving feel and running costs so you can see which one suits your …
Mazda 3 Sedan
VW ID.3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
serpimg_ikGkXb

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW ID.3

The VW ID.3 is Volkswagen’s compact electric hatch that prioritizes practical daily usability with a comfortable, modern interior. It delivers a smooth, quiet driving experience and intuitive tech that makes switching to electric straightforward.

details
DB2020AU01067_medium
DB2019AU01515_medium
DB2019AU01516_medium
DB2020AU01118_medium
DB2020AU01119_medium
DB2020AU01097_medium
DB2020AU01100_medium

Reviews VW ID.3

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Pennings
6 May 2026, 08:03:27

ID.3 catches less wind. It's more pleasant, especially on the highway. Also: more economical, lighter and with the same step‑in height.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Mr C Blagdon
14 Jan 2026, 12:07:54

Great all rounder, surprisingly spacious cabin. Rapid and refined. Not quiet enough space in the boot for a bike, could use more ground clearance.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

VW ID.3
VW ID.Polo
VS
Choosing between the Volkswagen ID.3 and the VW ID. Polo comes down to whether you want a compact electric hatch with more range and interior space (ID.3) or a smaller, city-focused EV that prioritizes maneuverability and lower running costs (ID. Polo). Below I'll compare their range, practicality, …
VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the VW ID.3 and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a nimble, hatchback-style EV focused on urban driving or a slightly more spacious, crossover-style model prioritizing practicality. This comparison looks at range, interior space, driving feel and overall value to help …
VW ID.3
Skoda Epiq
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Epiq pits two compact electric hatchbacks against each other: both suit city drivers and small families but prioritise different strengths. The ID.3 leans toward a refined, tech-focused driving experience, while the Epiq emphasises practical space, clever packaging and …
Kia EV3
VW ID.3
VS
Pitted against each other, the Kia EV3 feels like the roomy, no-nonsense upstart — taller, more practical and geared toward families who want SUV style without the fuel bill — while the VW ID.3 is the sharper, more polished hatch that rewards drivers who prefer nimble handling and mature software. …
BYD Dolphin
VW ID.3
VS
Comparing the BYD Dolphin and the Volkswagen ID.3 gives a clear picture of two distinct approaches to compact electric hatchbacks: the Dolphin emphasizes value, efficiency and clever packaging, while the ID.3 leans on refinement, driving dynamics and European build quality. If you prioritise range, …
MINI Countryman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Countryman and the VW ID.3 take very different approaches to practical compact motoring: the Countryman blends a premium, characterful small‑SUV package with petrol and hybrid options, while the ID.3 focuses on pure-electric efficiency, interior space and low running costs. If you value …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
VW ID.3
VW Polo
VS
Comparing the ID.3 and the Polo pits Volkswagen's all-electric compact against its conventional small hatchback, highlighting a choice between emissions-free efficiency and traditional practicality. The ID.3 emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and a spacious cabin, while the Polo offers lower …
Mazda 3 Sedan
VW ID.3

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,400 - 34,700 £
Price
29,100 - 40,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.9 - 14.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
410 - 629 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 137 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,468 kg
Curb weight
1,885 - 1,966 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
383 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,809 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
482 - 501 kg
Payload
422 - 464 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
170 - 231 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.1 - 8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
125 - 170 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.