What drive types are available for the Mazda 6 Estate?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda 6 Estate?

Depending on the version, the Mazda 6 Estate delivers up to 194 HP.

How much fuel does the Mazda 6 Estate use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.80 L.

How big is the Mazda 6 Estate overall?

The Mazda 6 Estate measures 4805 mm long, 1840 mm wide and 1480 mm high.

What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Skoda Kodiaq?

Depending on the version, the Skoda Kodiaq delivers up to 265 HP.

What is the fuel consumption of the Skoda Kodiaq according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Skoda Kodiaq consumes 0.40 L.

What is the Skoda Kodiaq’s maximum WLTP range?

According to WLTP, the Skoda Kodiaq can travel up to 123 km on a single charge.

How large is the Skoda Kodiaq’s battery?

The battery capacity is 19.70 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq reaches up to 231 km/h.

How big is the Skoda Kodiaq overall?

Length 4758 mm, width 1864 mm, height 1679 mm – those are the dimensions of the Skoda Kodiaq.

Mazda 6 Estate vs Skoda Kodiaq - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

6 Estate @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda 6 Estate has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 6848 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Mazda 6 Estate with 6.80 L. The difference is about 6.40 L per 100 km.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 265 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 71 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Mazda 6 Estate takes 8.10 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Mazda 6 Estate tops out at 223 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 400 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm difference.

6 Estate @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Mazda 6 Estate is slightly lighter – 1475 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 209 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers decisively more room – 910 L compared to 522 L. That’s a difference of about 388 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – up to 2105 L, which is about 441 L more than the Mazda 6 Estate.

When it comes to payload, Mazda 6 Estate minimal takes the win – 571 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mazda 6 Estate

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.

CUPRA Terramar

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

@ Toyota Motor Corporation

Toyota RAV4

VS

If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …

Costs and Consumption
Price 30000 - 43500 £	Price 36800 - 49600 £
Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7.6 L	Consumption L/100km 0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range 113 - 123 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 19.70 kWh
co2 155 - 172 g/km	co2 9 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 62 L	Fuel tank capacity 45 - 58 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type Estate	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 1475 - 1598 kg	Curb weight 1684 - 1970 kg
Trunk capacity 522 L	Trunk capacity 745 - 910 L
Length 4805 mm	Length 4758 - 4761 mm
Width 1840 mm	Width 1864 mm
Height 1480 mm	Height 1663 - 1683 mm
Max trunk capacity 1664 L	Max trunk capacity 1945 - 2105 L
Payload 483 - 571 kg	Payload 460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol	Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 145 - 194 HP	Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.1 - 10.7 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed 205 - 223 km/h	Max Speed 205 - 231 km/h
Torque 213 - 258 Nm	Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 107 - 143 kW	Power kW 110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity 1998 - 2488 cm3	Engine capacity 1498 - 1984 cm3