VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Citroen C3 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 113 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 13,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Citroen C3?

Mazda CX-30 vs Citroen C3: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • somewhat more efficient
  • a bit lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Citroen C3 is substantially cheaper – starting at 13,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,529 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Citroen C3 uses 5 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

C3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers markedly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 113 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Citroen C3 takes 9.9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-30 delivers somewhat more torque with 240 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 35 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 is a bit lighter – 1,226 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 229 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers markedly more boot space – 430 L compared to 310 L. That’s a difference of about 120 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries somewhat more – 496 kg compared to 423 kg. That’s a difference of about 73 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Opel Corsa
VS
The Citroën C3 charms with its quirky French flair, plush seats and a ride tuned more for comfort than cornering, while the Opel Corsa plays the sensible all-rounder with sharper handling, a tidier cabin and a broader engine lineup. If you want personality and city-friendly cushioning, pick the C3; …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Citroen C3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a cheeky little city car that turns heads with its bold, quirky styling and a surprisingly comfy, well-thought-out interior. It’s an ideal companion for urban life — easy to park, friendly to drive and built to make everyday trips feel a bit more fun without breaking the bank.

details
CITROEN_C3_25
CITROEN_C3_26
CITROEN_C3_44
12D30_01

Reviews Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Citroen C4
VS
The Citroën C3 is the cheeky city hatch that charms with low running costs, soft suspension and easy parking, while the Citroën C4 stretches into crossover territory with more space, stronger engines and sharper tech. If you mostly nip around town grab the C3 for its thrift and comfort; if you want …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Citroen C3
Citroen C3 Aircross
VS
The Citroën C3 is a cheeky, city-friendly hatch that’s easy to park, light on fuel and happy to nip through tight streets, while the Citroën C3 Aircross trades some of that nimbleness for SUV hauteur, extra interior space and a much more practical boot. Choose the C3 for pure urban agility and …
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Citroen C3 and Renault Captur both offer distinctive styles and practical features, catering to urban drivers. The Citroen C3 shines with its bold design and customizable options, making it a fun choice for those who value personalization. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior …
Mazda CX-30
Citroen C3

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
13,700 - 24,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
310 L
Length
-
Length
4,015 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,755 mm
Height
-
Height
1,567 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,220 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
227 - 423 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
132 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Citroen
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.