VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Honda HR-V comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 29,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Honda HR-V?

Mazda CX-30 vs Honda HR-V: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

Honda HR-V

4 (9 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely lighter
Overall, owners tend to find the Honda HR‑V a practical, reliable and economical compact SUV that’s easy to live with in town and for family duties, offering predictable handling and a comfortable ride. Common positives include good fuel economy, roomy/intuive packaging and reassuring manners; common negatives some owners mention are noticeable noise under brisk acceleration or low‑speed maneuvers and a tendency to feel underpowered on sustained highway runs. So while feedback is broadly favorable for city and everyday use, opinions are more mixed on long‑distance refinement — worth a motorway run during your test drive if that’s your regular terrain.

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

CX-30

Honda HR-V vs. Mazda CX-30: An In-Depth Comparison

In the fiercely competitive compact SUV market, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique characteristics and innovations. Both vehicles appeal to consumers looking for efficiency, style, and versatility. This article will delve into their technical specifications, features, and innovations to help potential buyers make an informed choice.

HR-V

Engine Performance and Variants

The Honda HR-V comes equipped with a full hybrid engine, delivering a respectable 130 HP and a torque output of 253 Nm. Powered by a 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine, it offers a smooth drive with its continuously variable transmission (CVT) and front-wheel drive setup. The HR-V achieves a 0-100 km/h acceleration in approximately 10.6 seconds, making it a reliable option for daily commuting.

On the other hand, the Mazda CX-30 boasts a variety of engine options, with the top variant producing an impressive 186 HP from a 2.5-liter engine, while a more fuel-efficient version offers 140 HP from a 2.0-liter engine. This range provides buyers with flexibility, allowing them to choose performance levels that suit their driving style. The CX-30 accelerates from 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.3 seconds, showcasing its sporty nature.

CX-30

Fuel Efficiency and Consumption

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Honda HR-V shines with a combined rating of just 5.4 L/100km, making it an economical choice for eco-conscious buyers. With a CO2 output of 122 g/km and a fuel tank capacity of 40 liters, the HR-V strikes a functional balance between performance and sustainability.

The Mazda CX-30, with its petrol MHEV engines, consumes between 5.7 to 6.6 L/100km, depending on the variant. While this is a bit higher compared to the HR-V, it still offers reasonable efficiency, particularly in the city. The CX-30's larger fuel tank of up to 51 liters allows for extended driving range, especially on longer trips.

HR-V

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the Honda HR-V measures 4340 mm in length and stands 1582 mm tall, providing a spacious interior for five passengers. The trunk capacity ranges between 320 to 335 liters, which is adequate for everyday needs.

The Mazda CX-30 slightly edges out in terms of dimensions, measuring 4395 mm long and 1795 mm wide. Its trunk capacity of 422 to 430 liters adds practicality, making it better suited for those requiring extra cargo space without compromising passenger comfort.

CX-30

Suspension and Driving Dynamics

Both SUVs prioritize driving comfort, but they adopt different philosophies. The Honda HR-V employs a more traditional approach with a strut front suspension that offers a balanced ride over various terrains. However, some drivers may find it less engaging in spirited driving compared to the Mazda.

The Mazda CX-30 leverages its engineering pedigree, offering a front-wheel-drive setup with optional all-wheel drive. Its finely-tuned suspension system provides excellent handling and a sportier ride, making it a joy to drive on winding roads. This aspect lends the CX-30 a competitive edge in terms of driving dynamics and enjoyment.

HR-V

Interior and Technology

Inside the Honda HR-V, the focus is on practicality and comfort, with user-friendly technology like a decent infotainment system featuring standard smartphone integration. The layout is clean and intuitive, providing a solid driving experience for families and individuals alike.

The Mazda CX-30 elevates the interior experience with its premium materials and sophisticated design. It features a larger infotainment display and a more refined audio system, marking a noticeable difference in craftsmanship. Moreover, its advanced safety features, such as adaptive cruise control and blind-spot monitoring, make it more appealing to safety-conscious consumers.

CX-30

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Choosing between the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 ultimately depends on individual priorities. If fuel efficiency, practicality, and a comfortable ride are your top considerations, the HR-V is a commendable choice. Conversely, if you value performance, sophisticated interior design, and sporty dynamics, the Mazda CX-30 captures the essence of an enjoyable driving experience.

Both vehicles reflect their brands' commitment to quality and innovation, making either a sound investment for those seeking a compact SUV.

Frequently compared as well

Honda HR-V
Renault Captur
VS
The Honda HR-V and Renault Captur go bumper-to-bumper in the small SUV ring, where style, space, and running costs matter more than lap times. We pit Japan’s pragmatic hybrid hero against France’s chic, tech-savvy all-rounder to see which one deserves your driveway—and your monthly payments.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is a bit cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Honda HR-V costs 29,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,508 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda HR-V uses 5.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

HR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers visibly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-30 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.6 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda HR-V delivers very slightly more torque with 253 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 13 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Honda HR-V is barely lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 3 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers markedly more boot space – 430 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 111 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries a bit more – 496 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details
Mazda CX-30
Honda HR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Honda HR-V

The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.

details
341992_N_chste_Generation_Der_neue_Honda_HR-V
341983_N_chste_Generation_Der_neue_Honda_HR-V
341976_N_chste_Generation_Der_neue_Honda_HR-V
346745_2021_Honda_HR-V_e_HEV

Reviews Honda HR-V

4 (9 Reviews)
rate
Iza
21 Mar 2026, 15:57:05

I think it's a very good car for the city, fairly quick, nimble, and above all intuitive.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Izabela
11 Mar 2026, 08:41:20

The Honda HR‑V is amazing. Quiet, intuitive, lots of space. It just drives well and I'm not even tired after sitting in traffic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Daniel
10 Feb 2026, 18:01:33

A car with elegant lines, reliable and enjoyable to drive, with a particular focus on fuel economy. Verdict: Pass!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
felix cortes
11 Jan 2026, 18:59:00

I recently bought an HR‑V, and I feel cheated. At the dealership they didn't warn me it's a city-only car; take it out on the highway and it has no power — with even a headwind the car barely moves. I'm very disappointed.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adriano
23 Oct 2025, 16:59:00

Same underpinnings as the Honda Jazz — which means the same strengths and the same weaknesses: very good grip, quick and reasonably precise steering. It stays composed in corners, even if it’s not exactly a sports car. With normal driving and a bit of care, hitting 25 km/l isn’t hard. Downsides: it gets noisy under sudden acceleration, and the brakes and suspension are a touch rattly when manoeuvring. All in all, a solid family car with perfectly decent performance and a straightforward, predictable character.

Frequently compared as well

Honda HR-V
Honda ZR-V
VS
Choose the Honda HR‑V if you want a compact, economical city SUV that’s practical and nimble—perfect for tight parking and sensible running costs. Opt for the Honda ZR‑V if you prefer more interior space, sharper styling and stronger engines plus a plusher cabin; it’s the slightly more grown‑up, …
Honda HR-V
Honda Jazz
VS
Think of the HR-V as the SUVs' extrovert — taller stance, more boot space and a confident road presence — while the Jazz is the clever, city‑savvy hatch that hides a brilliant, flexible cabin and frugal running costs. Choose the HR-V if you need space and SUV style; pick the Jazz if you value …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda HR-V is the clever, pragmatic compact SUV — roomy, economical and built for cost‑conscious buyers who want sensible packaging without fuss. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, feels like a grown‑up’s treat: pricier but wrapped in Scandinavian style, class‑leading safety tech and a premium cabin, …
Honda HR-V
Lexus LBX
VS
The Honda HR-V is the sensible, roomy all‑rounder—efficient, practical and easy on the wallet—while the Lexus LBX swaps utility for boutique luxury, sharper finishes and a hushed cabin. If you want value and usable space, pick the HR‑V; if you crave premium materials, a posh badge and don’t mind …
Mazda CX-30
Honda HR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
29,700 - 35,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
122 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,452 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
319 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
-
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
131 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
253 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
96 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Honda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.