VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Hongqi H9 – Which one offers the better deal?

Two cars, one duel: Mazda CX-30 meets Hongqi H9.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Hongqi H9 costs 60000 £. That’s a price difference of around 34761 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Hongqi H9 with 9.60 L. The difference is about 3.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Hongqi H9 has a noticeable edge – offering 245 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 59 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hongqi H9 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Hongqi H9 performs slightly better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 26 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Hongqi H9 pulls distinct stronger with 380 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 140 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is distinct lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1875 kg. The difference is around 420 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers convincingly more room – 430 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 430 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-30 slight takes the win – 496 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 46 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-30 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,200
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Hongqi H9

The Hongqi H9 asserts itself as a luxury sedan that seamlessly combines sophisticated design with opulent interior features, catering to those who appreciate grandeur and comfort. Characterized by a bold and elegant exterior, it commands the road with a presence that is both modern and majestic. Inside, occupants are treated to a lavish experience, with premium materials and advanced technology throughout, making every journey as pleasurable as possible.

details

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Hongqi H9
CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
60000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
9.60 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
220 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
62 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1875 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
5137 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1904 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1493 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
450 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
245 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.80 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
230 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
180 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1989 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Hongqi

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Juke
VS
When comparing the Mazda CX-30 and the Nissan Juke, the CX-30 stands out with its refined interior and superior driving dynamics, making it a prime choice for those seeking a more sophisticated and sporty driving experience. Meanwhile, the Nissan Juke offers a bold design and innovative features, appealing to drivers who prioritize unique styling and urban maneuverability. Both models deliver on fuel efficiency and compact versatility, but the choice ultimately hinges on whether you value Mazda's craftsmanship or Nissan's quirky charm.
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage stands out with its spacious interior and user-friendly technology features, making it a strong contender for families and tech enthusiasts alike. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 captivates drivers with its sporty handling and upscale interior, appealing to those who prioritize an engaging driving experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on whether buyers value practicality and space or a more dynamic, luxurious feel on the road.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.