Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (186 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Mazda CX-30 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-30 is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,051 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers noticeably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers significantly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is markedly lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 337 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers marginally more boot space – 472 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries moderately more – 600 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,300
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Mazda CX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-30
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Mazda CX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.