VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-30 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 18051 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.

Range Rover Evoque @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a distinct edge – offering 269 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs minimal better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Mazda CX-30 tops out at 204 km/h. The difference is around 9 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls significantly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm difference.

CX-30 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is distinct lighter – 1455 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 337 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers hardly perceptible more room – 472 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-30 performs slightly better – up to 1406 L, which is about 250 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque slightly takes the win – 600 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 104 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £43,300
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Mazda CX-30

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 effortlessly combines sleek design with a sense of adventure, making it an appealing choice for urban explorers and countryside enthusiasts alike. Inside, the cabin is thoughtfully designed, offering both comfort and cutting-edge technology to enhance the driving experience. Its performance on the road is agile, providing a smooth and engaging journey for drivers and passengers.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27 @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3 @ de.mazda-press.com

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
rate

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque combines refined luxury with robust off-road capabilities. Its sleek design and high-quality interior materials create an elegant yet comfortable driving experience. Advanced technology features and superior handling make it a versatile choice for both city and countryside adventures.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big @ media.landrover.com
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045 @ media.landrover.com
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15) @ media.landrover.com
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03 @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer interior; choose the Kamiq for everyday practicality, brilliant space use and better value for families and commuters.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Mazda CX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
CX-30
Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 - 51 L
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4395 mm
Length
4371 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1540 mm
Height
1649 mm
Max trunk capacity
1398 - 1406 L
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
191 - 204 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-30
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and SEAT Arona stand out with their unique design philosophies and driving dynamics. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and smooth handling, while the Arona offers agile performance and a sporty character. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, making them strong contenders for buyers seeking style and functionality.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. Meanwhile, the Yaris Cross impresses with its impressive fuel efficiency and practicality, catering well to urban drivers seeking versatility in a compact form.
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice between these two stands as a reflection of personal preference, whether one prioritizes luxury or driving dynamics.
BMW X1
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Mazda CX-30
Vauxhall Mokka
VS
Kia Sportage
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers practicality and comfort, boasting advanced safety features and a spacious interior, ideal for family-oriented drivers.
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a great choice for families and commuters alike. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile SUVs will depend on whether buyers value sporty flair or functional reliability in their daily drives.
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.