Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-30 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (186 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 61900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
CX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mazda CX-30 has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36651 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Velar manages with 4.80 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.70 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a significantly edge – offering 404 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 218 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls convincingly stronger with 650 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 410 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is distinct lighter – 1455 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 548 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar offers noticeable more room – 552 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Velar somewhat takes the win – 587 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 91 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £61,900
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Mazda CX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-30
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Mazda CX-30
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25200 - 36800 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1795 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?
The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.