Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Nissan Micra?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Nissan Micra is barely cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,714 £.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers moderately more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Micra is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Micra delivers barely more torque with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Micra is very slightly lighter – 1,452 kg compared to 1,455 kg. The difference is around 3 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries slightly more – 496 kg compared to 408 kg. That’s a difference of about 88 kg.
The Nissan Micra is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.
detailsThe Nissan Micra is a compact hatchback renowned for its agile handling and city-friendly dimensions. With a design that blends sleek curves with a practical layout, it appeals to urban drivers who value style and efficiency. Inside, the car offers a surprising amount of room and useful tech features, making it both a convenient and comfortable ride for daily commutes.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
|
Price
24,000 - 29,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.2 - 14.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
317 - 416 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
129 - 148 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
|
Curb weight
1,452 - 1,527 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,774 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
458 - 496 kg
|
Payload
403 - 408 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|