VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault R4 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Renault R4?

Mazda CX-30 vs Renault R4: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • barely lighter
details

Renault R4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-30 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Renault R4 costs 27,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,620 £.

R4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-30 offers slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R4 is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 8.2 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault R4 delivers very slightly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is barely lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 55 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault R4 offers considerably more boot space – 1,045 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 615 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-30 carries somewhat more – 496 kg compared to 443 kg. That’s a difference of about 53 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R4 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,300
R4

Renault R4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 409 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Fiat Grande Panda
Renault R4
VS
Comparing the practical, city-focused Fiat Panda with the delightfully utilitarian Renault 4 shows two distinct approaches to small-car design and everyday usefulness. The Panda leans on modern practicality, comfort and efficiency, while the Renault 4 trades those for mechanical simplicity, …
Renault R4
Kia EV2
VS
This is a practical head-to-head between the Renault R4 and the Kia EV2, two compact electric models aimed at affordable, efficient urban mobility. I’ll compare their driving feel, range, interior space and ownership costs to help you decide which one fits your daily needs best.
Mazda CX-30
Renault R4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault R4

The Renault R4, affectionately known as the "R4," is a quintessential symbol of French automotive simplicity and practicality. This classic compact car, originally introduced in the early 1960s, won over numerous enthusiasts with its versatile design and dependable performance. Its no-frills charm and robust build made it a beloved choice for rural drivers and city dwellers alike, cementing its status as an iconic piece of automotive history.

details
R-DAM_1606030
R-DAM_1606039
R-DAM_1605976

Reviews Renault R4

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Hyundai Inster
Renault R4
VS
The Hyundai Inster and the Renault 4 present two very different approaches to motoring: the Inster leans toward contemporary Hyundai comfort and technology, while the Renault 4 trades modern refinements for simple, characterful practicality. This comparison will focus on how they differ in driving …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Renault R4
VS
The Citroën C3 Aircross and Renault 4 go head-to-head in a clash of philosophies: the C3 Aircross is a compact family SUV built for practicality and comfort, while the Renault 4 is a charming, retro‑styled city car reimagined for modern life. We’ll cut through their space, drivability and everyday …
Hyundai Kona
Renault R4
VS
Comparing the Hyundai Kona and the Renault 4 puts a modern compact crossover up against a retro‑inspired city car revival, so buyers should focus on practicality, driving character and how they plan to use the car. The Kona leans toward sporty versatility and SUV practicality, while the Renault 4 …
Jeep Avenger
Renault R4
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Renault 4 make for an intriguing matchup: one is a compact, tech-rich electric SUV aimed at urban adventurers, the other a revived classic that trades flash for charm, simplicity and everyday practicality. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — modern performance, …
Renault R4
Skoda Epiq
VS
This comparison pits the Renault R4 against the Skoda Epiq, helping you choose between Renault’s compact, characterful offering and Skoda’s modern, tech-focused alternative. I’ll focus on the things that matter in real ownership—space, driving feel, efficiency and running costs—so you can see which …
Kia EV3
Renault R4
VS
Think of the Kia EV3 as the sharp, efficient newcomer — punchy range, clean interior and contemporary tech that suits commuters wanting sensible electric daily transport — while the Renault 4 is a lovable throwback: quirky styling, simple practicality and urban charm that puts a smile on every …
Mazda CX-30
Renault R4

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Price
27,300 - 32,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
409 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,510 - 1,537 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
420 - 1,045 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,808 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
385 - 443 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
110 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.